Literature DB >> 8078038

Good quality quality? Some methodological issues.

C E Selai1, R M Rosser.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8078038      PMCID: PMC1294045     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--III: Population and context effects.

Authors:  D G Froberg; R L Kane
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  QALYs: are they enough? A health economist's perspective.

Authors:  G Mooney
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Resource allocation: idealism, realism, pragmatism, openness.

Authors:  N W Goodman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The QALY argument: a physician's and a philosopher's view.

Authors:  J Rawles; K Rawles
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Castigating QALYs.

Authors:  J Rawles
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  A Williams
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-08-03

7.  QALYfying the value of life.

Authors:  J Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Qualms about QALYs.

Authors:  A Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Logic in medicine: an economic perspective.

Authors:  A Maynard
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-12-12

10.  The principle of QALY maximisation as the basis for allocating health care resources.

Authors:  J Cubbon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  2 in total

1.  Eliciting EuroQol descriptive data and utility scale values from inpatients. A feasibility study.

Authors:  C Selai; R Rosser
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Choices in oncology: factors that influence patients' treatment preference.

Authors:  G M Kiebert; A M Stiggelbout; J Kievit; J W Leer; C J van de Velde; H J de Haes
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.147

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.