Literature DB >> 112252

Choosing priorities.

J A Gray.   

Abstract

Dr Gray leaves us with a question at the conclusion of his article--how should we choose priorities? He says that the debate so far has been mainly on what we should choose, but perhaps we should consider how to choose even more. Under the various subheadings of Criteria, Principles and Persons Dr Gray sets out the pros and cons of the arguments in the priority debates and tries to offer some more specific guidelines to offset the criticism that the government's priority discussions have been too generalised. Yet this is a difficult task when everyone's priorities are so different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 112252      PMCID: PMC1154718          DOI: 10.1136/jme.5.2.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

Review 1.  Good quality quality? Some methodological issues.

Authors:  C E Selai; R M Rosser
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Cost-benefit analysis and medical ethics.

Authors:  G H Mooney
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Essentials of health economics: Part IV--Challenges for the future.

Authors:  M F Drummond; G H Mooney
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-12-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.