Literature DB >> 6772334

Porcine xenograft valves. Long-term (60-89-month) follow-up.

J B Lakier, F Khaja, D J Magilligan, S Goldstein.   

Abstract

An analysis of 211 patients who had porcine xenograft valve replacements at Henry Ford Hospital between October 1971 and March 1974, was accomplished, with 100% follow-up. The follow-up period extended from 60-89 months after implantation. One hundred sixty-seven patients with 192 valves survived the perioperative period and were subjected to life table analysis. Hemodynamically significant porcine xenograft degeneration that required reoperation occurred in 18 patients, two of whom had infective endocarditis. Only four valves failed within 48 months of surgery. Ten of 42 (23.8%) patients with isolated aortic valve replacement and eight of 102 patients (7.8%) patients with isolated mitral valve replacement required reoperation (p < 0.01). In patients under 25 years of age, six of nine surviving patients had repeat operations. Our data indicate that porcine xenograft degeneration is related to the duration of implantation and the age of the patient at the time implantation was performed. In addition, porcine xenograft valves in the aortic position are more likely to degenerate than are those in the mitral position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6772334     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.62.2.313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  7 in total

1.  Selective transplantation. An emerging concept.

Authors:  P S Russell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Biologic determinants of dystrophic calcification and osteocalcin deposition in glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine aortic valve leaflets implanted subcutaneously in rats.

Authors:  R J Levy; F J Schoen; J T Levy; A C Nelson; S L Howard; L J Oshry
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  Bioengineering aspects of heart valve replacement.

Authors:  F J Schoen; J L Titus; G M Lawrie
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Double valve Implantation. Long-term evaluation of 8 different bioprostheses.

Authors:  P Stassano; V Mannacio; A Musumeci; A Golino; P Maida; V Ferrigno; G Buonocore; N Spampinato
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1991

5.  The bioprosthetic valve of choice for high-risk patients: long-term results (up to 10 years).

Authors:  P Stassano; C Gagliardi; L Matarazzo; A Musumeci; N Spampinato
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1985-12

6.  Experiences with 1643 porcine prosthetic valves in 1492 patients.

Authors:  F C Spencer; F G Baumann; E A Grossi; A T Culliford; A C Galloway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Late results of mitral valve replacement using unstented antibiotic sterilised aortic homografts.

Authors:  S A Qureshi; M A Halim; G Campalani; Y J Coe; M K Towers; M H Yacoub
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1983-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.