Literature DB >> 15227506

Double valve Implantation. Long-term evaluation of 8 different bioprostheses.

P Stassano1, V Mannacio, A Musumeci, A Golino, P Maida, V Ferrigno, G Buonocore, N Spampinato.   

Abstract

From January 1976 through December 1987, 194 patients with a mean age of 43.3 +/- 13.7 years (range, 11 to 74 years) underwent double (mitral and aortic) replacement of native valves with 8 types of bioprostheses: Carpentier-Edwards, 127 valves; Hancock, 76 valves; Liotta-Bioimplant, 57 valves; Ionescu-Shiley, 53 valves; Vascor, 27 valves; Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial, 22 valves; Angell-Shiley, 20 valves; and Implamedic, 6 valves. Concomitant cardiac procedures were performed in 25 patients (12.8%). There were 18 operative deaths (9.27%). Our retrospective analysis was restricted to 352 bioprostheses implanted in the 176 patients who survived surgery and were considered at risk for valve tissue failure. The overall cumulative duration of follow-up was 1,174.1 patient-years (range, 1 to 13 years). The durations of follow-up for specific valves were: Carpentier-Edwards, 920.2 valve-years; Hancock, 383.8 valve-years; Liotta-Bioimplant, 310.2 valve-years; Ionescu-Shiley, 357.7 valve-years; Vascor, 131.2 valve-years; Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial, 52.0 valve-years; Angell-Shiley, 167.0 valve-years; and Implamedic, 31.0 valve-years. Thirty patients had thromboembolic accidents, for a linearized incidence of 2.5% per patient-year. At 13 years, the actuarial freedom from thromboembolic accidents was 85.8% +/- 10.7%. Nine patients had endocarditis, for a linearized incidence of 0.7% per patient-year. At 13 years, the actuarial freedom from endocarditis was 92.0% +/- 1.5%. Twenty-four patients had valve tissue failure, for a cumulative linearized incidence of 1.87% per valve-year. The cumulative actuarial probability of freedom from valve tissue failure was 78.6% +/- 3.7% at 10 years and 51.2% +/- 10.7% at 13 years. The 24 patients with valve tissue failure all underwent reoperation: 20 of these had double valve replacement, 3 had aortic valve replacement alone, and 1 had mitral valve replacement alone. The mean interval between initial valve implantation and reoperation was 66.9 +/- 28.8 months. At reoperation, the hospital mortality was 15.1% (5 patients). This study showed that the long-term results of valve implantation are not significantly influenced by either prosthesis design or material. Moreover, the incidence of degenerative change was similar in the aortic and mitral positions.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 15227506      PMCID: PMC324958     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  22 in total

1.  Re: Low-profile bioprosthesis for mitral regurgitation associated with idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis.

Authors:  P Stassano; D Iorio; C Gagliardi; N Spampinato
Journal:  Cleve Clin Q       Date:  1985

2.  Long-term evaluation of the porcine xenograft bioprosthesis.

Authors:  P E Oyer; E B Stinson; B A Reitz; D C Miller; S J Rossiter; N E Shumway
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Degeneration in porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves: incidence of primary tissue failures among 938 bioprostheses at risk.

Authors:  I Gallo; B Ruiz; F Nistal; C M Durán
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Calcific degeneration as the main cause of porcine bioprosthetic valve failure.

Authors:  A Milano; U Bortolotti; E Talenti; C Valfrè; E Arbustini; M Valente; A Mazzucco; V Gallucci; G Thiene
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Failure of Hancock xenograft valve: importance of valve position (4- to 9-year follow-up).

Authors:  H Bolooki; S Mallon; G A Kaiser; R J Thurer; J Kieval
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up.

Authors:  G L Hammond; A S Geha; G S Kopf; S W Hashim
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  The porcine bioprosthetic valve. Twelve years later.

Authors:  D J Magilligan; J W Lewis; B Tilley; E Peterson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.

Authors:  R S Hartz; E B Fisher; B Finkelmeier; A DeBoer; J H Sanders; J M Moran; L L Michaelis
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Fate of a second porcine bioprosthetic valve.

Authors:  D J Magilligan; J W Lewis; R H Heinzerling; D Smith
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Calcification of aortic versus mitral porcine bioprosthetic heart valves: a radiographic study comparing amounts of calcific deposits in valves explanted from the same patient.

Authors:  P R Cipriano; M E Billingham; D C Miller
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical results of the Pop De Popa xenobioprosthesis in patients with advanced heart failure: long-term follow-up of 562 patients.

Authors:  I P De Popa; D Gherghiceanu; M Bârsan; C Macarie; I Socoteanu; T Petrila; F Bradu; R Fagarasanu; L Panta
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1992
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.