Literature DB >> 3487294

Experiences with 1643 porcine prosthetic valves in 1492 patients.

F C Spencer, F G Baumann, E A Grossi, A T Culliford, A C Galloway.   

Abstract

Sixteen hundred and forty-three porcine prosthetic values (1102 Carpentier-Edwards, 541 Hancock) were implanted in 1492 patients at New York University Medical Center between January 1976 and June 1983. The aortic valve alone was replaced in 786 patients (53%), mitral valve alone in 556 (37%), and multiple valves in 143 patients (9.6%). Concomitant coronary artery bypass was performed in 326 patients (22%). There were 116 deaths within 30 days of operation (7.8%). Follow-up (mean: 42 months) was completed in 94% of survivors and revealed that late survival from cardiac-related death was 87% at 5 years and 81% at 7 years, with no significant difference between the Carpentier-Edwards and Hancock patients. Late thromboembolic complications, however, were significantly more frequent in Hancock patients at all intervals from 1-7 years (p less than 0.05), whether in the aortic or mitral position. Patients with coronary artery disease who had concomitant coronary bypass showed a survival from late cardiac death that did not differ significantly from that of patients undergoing valve replacement alone. Before operation, 87% of patients were in New York Heart Association Class III or IV, but after operation 80% were in Class I or II. Late anticoagulant complications, endocarditis, and valve dysfunction were relatively rare. These results from a series of such size, duration, and representative numbers of two types of porcine bioprosthesis confirm excellent results with porcine prostheses in the first 4-5 years following operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3487294      PMCID: PMC1251208          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198606000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  13 in total

1.  Long-term results in 1375 patients undergoing valve replacement with the Starr-Edwards cloth-covered steel ball prosthesis.

Authors:  O W Isom; S E Glassman; P Teiko; A D Boyd; J N Cunningham; G E Reed
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Long-term evaluation of the porcine xenograft bioprosthesis.

Authors:  P E Oyer; E B Stinson; B A Reitz; D C Miller; S J Rossiter; N E Shumway
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  Five-year evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis.

Authors:  W R Jamieson; L C Pelletier; M T Janusz; B R Chaitman; F O Tyers; R T Miyagishima
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Factors affecting performance and thromboembolism after porcine xenograft cardiac valve replacement.

Authors:  A S Geha; G L Hammond; H Laks; H C Stansel; W W Glenn
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Twelve-year experience with glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine xenografts.

Authors:  W W Angell; J D Angell; J C Kosek
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Clinical durability of the pericardial xenograft valve: ten years experience with mitral replacement.

Authors:  M I Ionescu; D R Smith; S S Hasan; M Chidambaram; A P Tandon
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience.

Authors:  L D Joyce; R M Nelson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  The porcine bioprosthesis. A review of 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement.

Authors:  C R Hatcher; J M Craver; E L Jones; D K Bone; R A Guyton
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Heart valve replacement with the Hancock bioprosthesis: a 6-year review.

Authors:  J I Gallo; B Ruiz; M F Carrion; J A Gutierrez; J L Vega; C M Duran
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Porcine xenograft valves. Long-term (60-89-month) follow-up.

Authors:  J B Lakier; F Khaja; D J Magilligan; S Goldstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  3 in total

1.  Transplantation of tissues and organs. Review of the first 100 years of the Southern Surgical Association.

Authors:  J D Hardy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with bioprosthetic valves.

Authors:  Ajay Yadlapati; Christopher Groh; S Chris Malaisrie; Mark Gajjar; Jane Kruse; Sheridan Meyers; Rod Passman
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Conservative surgery of the mitral valve: a report of the first 100 cases from one unit and one surgeon.

Authors:  A Kenny; C A Fuller; L M Shapiro; F C Wells
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.