Literature DB >> 6748688

Males and the advantage of sex.

J T Manning.   

Abstract

Most sexual populations are at a two-fold disadvantage to parthenogenetic populations. This is because males are produced in equal numbers to females and males contribute virtually no food supplies to the zygote. Females therefore "waste their energy" in the production of sons. Parthenogenetic females produce only daughters and therefore have a two-fold advantage. It is argued that female choice (of males) and male: male competition can reduce mutational loads and this may compensate for the two-fold disadvantage of males. The Haldane mutation load principle indicates a load of 2mu, where mu is the mutation rate per gamete. Female choice and male: male competition are capable of reducing this substantially. The effect is greatest with mildly deleterious mutations and is therefore dependent on the fitness of the mutations. This is in contrast to the Haldane principle load which is determined by the mutation rate only. As most mutations appear to be mildly deleterious the load in many sexual populations may be substantially below that indicated by the Haldane principle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6748688     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(84)80067-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  15 in total

1.  Are males the more 'sensitive' sex?

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K MacLellan; L Kwan; M C Whitlock; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review).

Authors:  W D Hamilton; R Axelrod; R Tanese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. II. Facultative apomixis and selfing.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The effect of purging on sexually selected traits through antagonistic pleiotropy with survival.

Authors:  Geir H Bolstad; Christophe Pélabon; Line-K Larsen; Ian A Fleming; Aslaug Viken; Gunilla Rosenqvist
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  The evolution of sex is favoured during adaptation to new environments.

Authors:  Lutz Becks; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Sexual selection and the evolution of obligatory sex.

Authors:  Lilach Hadany; Tuvik Beker
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Evolution of female preference for younger males.

Authors:  Christopher W Beck; Daniel E L Promislow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.