Literature DB >> 6745006

A photographic representation of the variability in the G-banded structure of the chromosomes in the mouse karyotype. A guide to the identification of the individual chromosomes.

J K Cowell.   

Abstract

Analysis of the mouse chromosomes is becoming increasingly important in many fields of genetic research. It is generally considered that the mouse chromosomes are more difficult to analyse than, for example, human chromosomes which has often led to their misidentification. This article presents a guide to the correct identification of trypsin-Giemsa banded chromosomes from the mouse. The variability in the G-banded structure of each chromosome is presented pictorially together with some suggestions for their unequivocal identification. Since many of the mouse chromosomes have similar banding patterns, those chromosomes which are more frequently misidentified have been compared and contrasted. Finally a summary of the main features for the identification of each chromosome is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6745006     DOI: 10.1007/BF00292478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  14 in total

1.  A system of nomenclature for band patterns of mouse chromosomes.

Authors:  M N Nesbitt; U Francke
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  The karyotype of the mouse.

Authors:  W Schnedl
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Chromosome changes associated with the progression of cell lines from preneoplastic to tumorigenic phenotype during transformation of mouse salivary gland epithelium in vitro.

Authors:  J K Cowell; C B Wigley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Appearance of double minute chromosomes in somatic cell hybridisation experiments involving the HAT selection system.

Authors:  J K Cowell
Journal:  Cell Biol Int Rep       Date:  1982-04

Review 5.  Double minutes and homogeneously staining regions: gene amplification in mammalian cells.

Authors:  J K Cowell
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Trisomy of chromosome No 13 in spontaneous mammary tumors of GR, C3H, and noninbred Swiss mice.

Authors:  R Dofuku; T Utakoji; A Matsuzawa
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Identification of the mouse karyotype by quinacrine fluorescence, and tentative assignment of seven linkage groups.

Authors:  O J Miller; D A Miller; R E Kouri; P W Allderdice; V G Dev; M S Grewal; J J Hutton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Chromosomes and cancer in the mouse: studies in tumors, established cell lines, and cell hybrids.

Authors:  D A Miller; O J Miller
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 6.242

9.  Standard karyotype of the mouse, Mus musculus.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1972 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  Consistent chromosome abnormalities associated with mouse bladder epithelial cell lines transformed in vitro.

Authors:  J K Cowell
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  20 in total

1.  Differential distribution of long and short interspersed element sequences in the mouse genome: chromosome karyotyping by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  A L Boyle; S G Ballard; D C Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cytogenetic analyses of a murine carcinoma cell line and six metastatic derivatives with different degrees of radioresistability.

Authors:  R J Jamasbi; M Q Ye; T M Norvell
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  Evolution of the structure and composition of house mouse satellite DNA sequences in the subgenus Mus (Rodentia: Muridea): a cytogenomic approach.

Authors:  B Cazaux; J Catalan; F Justy; C Escudé; E Desmarais; J Britton-Davidian
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Early phase karyotype analysis of chromosome segregation after formation of mouse-mouse hybridomas with chromosome painting probes.

Authors:  L Wollweber; H Münster; S Hoffmann; K Siller; K O Greulich
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Chromosomal alterations in cell lines derived from mouse rhabdomyosarcomas induced by crystalline nickel sulfide.

Authors:  N T Christie; P Sen; M Costa
Journal:  Biol Met       Date:  1988

6.  High resolution G-banded chromosomes of the mouse.

Authors:  J R Sawyer; M M Moore; J C Hozier
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Genetic cooperation between the Werner syndrome protein and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in preventing chromatid breaks, complex chromosomal rearrangements, and cancer in mice.

Authors:  Michel Lebel; Josée Lavoie; Isabelle Gaudreault; Marc Bronsard; Régen Drouin
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Cancer predisposition and hematopoietic failure in Rad50(S/S) mice.

Authors:  Carla F Bender; Michael L Sikes; Ruth Sullivan; Leslie Erskine Huye; Michelle M Le Beau; David B Roth; Olga K Mirzoeva; Eugene M Oltz; John H J Petrini
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Mouse palmitoyl protein thioesterase: gene structure and expression of cDNA.

Authors:  T Salonen; E Hellsten; N Horelli-Kuitunen; L Peltonen; A Jalanko
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  The development of chromosome-specific composite DNA probes for the mouse and their application to chromosome painting.

Authors:  J W Breneman; M J Ramsey; D A Lee; G G Eveleth; J L Minkler; J D Tucker
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.