Literature DB >> 10730587

Early phase karyotype analysis of chromosome segregation after formation of mouse-mouse hybridomas with chromosome painting probes.

L Wollweber1, H Münster, S Hoffmann, K Siller, K O Greulich.   

Abstract

FISH analysis with chromosome painting probes allows, better than karyotyping after Giemsa banding, the study of chromosome segregation after hybridoma formation. FISH is particularly useful for intraspecies hybrids and allows visualization of small chromosome fragments. Cell hybrids were constructed between P3 x 63Ag8.653 mouse myeloma cells and lymphocytes from BALB/c mice by PEG fusion and by selection in hypoxanthine azaserine medium. Three hybridomas (A4, D8, F10) were selected and, after cloning, the cells were cultivated in vitro over a period of 28 days. During this time in culture, air-dried metaphase spreads were prepared by standard methods. For FISH chromosome painting, digoxigenin- and biotin-labeled mouse chromosome painting probes and rhodamine-antidigoxigenin antibodies and fluorescein-avidin were used for dual color detection. Total chromosome numbers and the numbers of mouse chromosomes 1, X, 6 and 12 were estimated as function of days in culture. Mean chromosome numbers of 78 (D8), 82 (F10) and 150 (A4) were observed. The major rearrangements of chromosome numbers occured in the first 28 days in culture and did not change significantly between day 28 and day 56. Mouse chromosome #12, which had the largest chromosome fragments in the parent myeloma, remained stable while the number of X chromosomes, which were significantly fragmented already in the parent myeloma, decreased by approximately 50%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10730587     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009223102068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  28 in total

1.  A new mouse myeloma cell line that has lost immunoglobulin expression but permits the construction of antibody-secreting hybrid cell lines.

Authors:  J F Kearney; A Radbruch; B Liesegang; K Rajewsky
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 2.  Chromosome painting: a useful art.

Authors:  T Ried; E Schröck; Y Ning; J Wienberg
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  FISH probes for mouse chromosome identification.

Authors:  Y P Shi; G Mohapatra; J Miller; D Hanahan; E Lander; P Gold; D Pinkel; J Gray
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  [Karyological analysis of hybridoma cells after prolonged cultivation].

Authors:  M A Zhil'tsova; M N Trofimova; V V Novikov
Journal:  Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol       Date:  1989-06

5.  [Karyological analysis of hybridoma lines producing monoclonal antibodies to viral antigens].

Authors:  M A Rodova; L A Tsoĭ; A A Kushch; A S Novokhatskiĭ
Journal:  Tsitol Genet       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec

6.  Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries.

Authors:  P Lichter; T Cremer; J Borden; L Manuelidis; D C Ward
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Immunoglobulin chain loss in hybridoma lines.

Authors:  G Köhler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  [Karyologic research on murine B-cell hybridomas].

Authors:  G M Volgareva
Journal:  Tsitologiia       Date:  1985-12

9.  Quantitative analysis of human chromosome segregation in man-mouse somatic cell hybrids.

Authors:  A R Rushton
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1976

10.  Non-random human chromosome distribution in human-mouse myeloma somatic cell hybrids.

Authors:  W Cieplinski; P Reardon; M A Testa
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1983
View more
  3 in total

1.  Inherent variability of cancer-specific aneuploidy generates metastases.

Authors:  Mathew Bloomfield; Peter Duesberg
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Is cancer progression caused by gradual or simultaneous acquisitions of new chromosomes?

Authors:  Mathew Bloomfield; Peter Duesberg
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  When monoclonal antibodies are not monospecific: Hybridomas frequently express additional functional variable regions.

Authors:  Andrew R M Bradbury; Nathan D Trinklein; Holger Thie; Ian C Wilkinson; Atul K Tandon; Stephen Anderson; Catherine L Bladen; Brittany Jones; Shelley Force Aldred; Marco Bestagno; Oscar Burrone; Jennifer Maynard; Fortunato Ferrara; James S Trimmer; Janina Görnemann; Jacob Glanville; Philipp Wolf; Andre Frenzel; Julin Wong; Xin Yu Koh; Hui-Yan Eng; David Lane; Marie-Paule Lefranc; Mike Clark; Stefan Dübel
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.857

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.