Literature DB >> 7508363

The development of chromosome-specific composite DNA probes for the mouse and their application to chromosome painting.

J W Breneman1, M J Ramsey, D A Lee, G G Eveleth, J L Minkler, J D Tucker.   

Abstract

The speed and ease of human cytogenetic analysis has been greatly enhanced by the technique of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Non-radioactive fluorescently tagged complex DNA probes specific for individual chromosomes can be hybridized to conventionally obtained metaphase chromosome spreads. Several chromosomes may be "painted" concurrently by using combinations of different labeled probes. Surveys of chromosome breakage and rearrangement may be performed very quickly by avoiding the time consuming process of GTG-banding. The application of FISH to mouse cytogenetics would allow large scale molecular toxicology studies to be conducted on the effects of such environmental insults as potential carcinogens, mutagens and radiation. Progress has been hampered, however, as the Mus musculus karyotype consists of 40 acrocentric chromosomes of approximately the same size, making the recognition and separation of individual chromosomes very difficult. We now describe the successful production and application of chromosome-specific composite DNA probes for M. musculus chromosomes 2 and 8. Stable Robertsonian translocated chromosomes were isolated on a flow sorter and their DNA subsequently amplified by degenerate oligonucleotide primer (DOP) PCR. Small pools (300 copies) of each chromosome were denatured at 94 degrees C then annealed with the primer at 30 degrees C for 15 cycles. This was followed by 20 cycles at an annealing temperature of 62 degrees C. Additional amplification was performed at an annealing temperature of 62 degrees C. The chromosome-specific DNA was labeled with biotin 11-dUTP by nick translation and used for FISH. The usefulness of the technique for translocation detection is demonstrated by analyzing chromosome exchanges induced in mice irradiated with 137Cs gamma rays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7508363     DOI: 10.1007/bf00352306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  37 in total

1.  Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer.

Authors:  H Telenius; N P Carter; C E Bebb; M Nordenskjöld; B A Ponder; A Tunnacliffe
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.736

2.  Molecular mapping of mouse chromosomes 4 and 6: use of a flow-sorted Robertsonian chromosome.

Authors:  N Bahary; J E Pachter; R Felman; R L Leibel; K Albright; S Cram; J M Friedman
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.736

3.  Microdissection and microcloning of the mouse X chromosome.

Authors:  E M Fisher; J S Cavanna; S D Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A new method for the preparation of metaphase chromosomes for flow analysis.

Authors:  R Sillar; B D Young
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries.

Authors:  P Lichter; T Cremer; J Borden; L Manuelidis; D C Ward
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  A human-derived probe, p82H, hybridizes to the centromeres of gorilla, chimpanzee, and orangutan.

Authors:  D A Miller; V Sharma; A R Mitchell
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Rapid detection of human chromosome 21 aberrations by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  P Lichter; T Cremer; C J Tang; P C Watkins; L Manuelidis; D C Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Comparison of type and frequency of chromosome aberrations by conventional and G-staining methods in Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  K Ohtaki; H Shimba; A A Awa; T Sofuni
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Mouse major (gamma) satellite DNA is highly conserved and organized into extremely long tandem arrays: implications for recombination between nonhomologous chromosomes.

Authors:  B Vissel; K H Choo
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.736

10.  A chromosome 1-specific DNA library from the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domestica).

Authors:  J R Miller; S C Dixon; N G Miller; E M Tucker; J Hindkjaer; P D Thomsen
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1992
View more
  8 in total

1.  Construction of chromosome-specific DNA libraries covering the whole genome of field bean (Vicia faba L.).

Authors:  J Macas; G Gualberti; M Nouzová; P Samec; S Lucretti; J Dolezel
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Paternally inherited chromosomal structural aberrations detected in mouse first-cleavage zygote metaphases by multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization painting.

Authors:  F Marchetti; X Lowe; D H Moore; J Bishop; A J Wyrobek
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Reciprocal translocations in somatic and germ cells of mice chronically exposed by inhalation to ethylene oxide: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  E Maria Donner; Brian A Wong; R Arden James; R Julian Preston
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Chromosome 'painting' in plants - a feasible technique?

Authors:  J Fuchs; A Houben; A Brandes; I Schubert
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Mouse molecular cytogenetic resource: 157 BACs link the chromosomal and genetic maps.

Authors:  J R Korenberg; X N Chen; K L Devon; D Noya; M L Oster-Granite; B W Birren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Establishment of immortalized alveolar type II epithelial cell lines from adult rats.

Authors:  K E Driscoll; J M Carter; P T Iype; H L Kumari; L L Crosby; M J Aardema; R J Isfort; D Cody; M H Chestnut; J L Burns
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Mouse chromosome-specific painting probes generated from microdissected chromosomes.

Authors:  M C Liechty; B K Hall; J M Scalzi; L M Davis; W J Caspary; J C Hozier
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  The importance of age and smoking in evaluating adverse cytogenetic effects of exposure to environmental agents.

Authors:  J D Tucker; D H Moore
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.