Literature DB >> 6738037

Stimulus duration and frequency discrimination for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

J W Hall, E J Wood.   

Abstract

Frequency discrimination for 500- and 2000-Hz pure tones at durations of 5, 10, 20, 50, and 200 ms was determined for 10 normal-hearing and 10 cochlear-impaired listeners. Listeners from both groups demonstrated monotonic increases in frequency difference limens as stimulus duration decreased. The functions of the hearing-impaired listeners were parallel to those of the normal-hearing listeners for stimulus durations between 10 and 200 ms, but the overall performance of the hearing-impaired group was poorer than that of the normal-hearing group. The functions of many of the cochlear-impaired subjects were less steep than normal for the shortest durations tested (between 5 and 10 ms). There appeared to be no relation between temporal integration for frequency discrimination and temporal integration for detection threshold. The results are discussed in terms of processes of temporal integration and frequency selectivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6738037     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2702.256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  6 in total

1.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: the effects of hearing loss on temporal integration reconsidered.

Authors:  Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

2.  Frequency discrimination duration effects for Huggins pitch and narrowband noise (L).

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Martine Turgeon; Stuart Lancaster; Robert P Carlyon; Hedwig E Gockel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Characterizing the dependence of pure-tone frequency difference limens on frequency, duration, and level.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Li Xiao; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Frequency discrimination in rats measured with tone-step stimuli and discrete pure tones.

Authors:  Andrew M Sloan; Owen T Dodd; Robert L Rennaker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Late, not early mismatch responses to changes in frequency are reduced or deviant in children with dyslexia: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Lorna F Halliday; Johanna G Barry; Mervyn J Hardiman; Dorothy Vm Bishop
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.025

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.