Literature DB >> 6735933

Profile analysis and level variation.

C R Mason, G Kidd, T E Hanna, D M Green.   

Abstract

This study examines the effects of random level variation, a method used in studies of profile analysis [3-6,14,15]. Presentation levels for a complex of sinusoids are varied randomly on each interval of a two-interval, forced-choice detection task in which subjects are required to detect an increment on one of the sinusoidal components of the complex. Three experiments are reported. The first experiment examines the effect of the range of level variation. The second is concerned with the effects of the median level about which the presentation levels vary. The third experiment is designed to provide a within-trial analysis of the effect of the differences in presentation levels. As the range of level variation is increased, ability to detect the increment decreases. The results indicate that detection performance is best at moderate intensity levels and decreases at lower and higher levels. Finally, the difference in levels within a single trial has little if any effect.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6735933     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90080-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Influences of modulation and spatial separation on detection of a masked broadband target.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of spatial uncertainty of masker on masked detection for nonspeech stimuli.

Authors:  Wei Li Fan; Timothy M Streeter; Nathaniel I Durlach
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Analysis of spectral shape in the barn owl auditory system.

Authors:  U Langemann; M A Zokoll; G M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  The Effects of Duration and Level on Spectral Modulation Perception.

Authors:  Sittiprapa Isarangura; Ann C Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  On the choice of adequate randomization ranges for limiting the use of unwanted cues in same-different, dual-pair, and oddity tasks.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Separating the contributions of primary and unwanted cues in psychophysical studies.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Effect of level on spectral-ripple detection threshold for listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Erik J Jorgensen; Ryan W McCreery; Benjamin J Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.