Literature DB >> 6725770

Concurrent minimum audible angle: a re-examination of the concept of auditory spatial acuity.

D R Perrott.   

Abstract

Minimum audible angle was measured for simultaneous acoustic events. Localization of concurrent events was found to be a direct function of the spectral differences between the events, the angle between the sources, and the location of the sources within the field defined by the subject. In the latter case, the m.a.a. was smallest with sources placed symmetrically about the listener's median plane and maximal at the extreme lateral portions. Post-hoc tests were completed which indicate that the spectral limits for concurrent localization is dependent both upon the angular separation of the sources and the position within the field as defined by the locus of the subject. The functions obtained approach the values reported by Mills [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30, 237-246(1958)] as the temporal overlap between the concurrent events decreased. The present results suggest that a single localization function may exist with the optimal performance observed with fully successive stimuli and poorest performance in the condition involving simultaneous events. The implications of these results are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6725770     DOI: 10.1121/1.390771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Extracting binaural information from simultaneous targets and distractors: effects of amplitude modulation and asynchronous envelopes.

Authors:  Mark A Stellmack; Andrew J Byrne; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Can measures of sound localization acuity be related to the precision of absolute location estimates?

Authors:  Jordan M Moore; Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Free-field study on auditory localization and discrimination performance in older adults.

Authors:  Claudia Freigang; Kristina Schmiedchen; Ines Nitsche; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Six Degrees of Auditory Spatial Separation.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Alex Fox; Emily Orchard-Mills; Johahn Leung; David Alais
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-31

5.  Where did that noise come from? Memory for sound locations is exceedingly eccentric both in front and in rear space.

Authors:  Franco Delogu; Phillip McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-06-13

6.  The role of spectral composition of sounds on the localization of sound sources by cats.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Janet L Ruhland; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The role of spatiotemporal and spectral cues in segregating short sound events: evidence from auditory Ternus display.

Authors:  Qingcui Wang; Ming Bao; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Multiple sounds degrade the frequency representation in monkey inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Shawn M Willett; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.698

9.  Resolution of lateral acoustic space assessed by electroencephalography and psychoacoustics.

Authors:  Jan Bennemann; Claudia Freigang; Erich Schröger; Rudolf Rübsamen; Nicole Richter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-11

10.  Modelling of human low frequency sound localization acuity demonstrates dominance of spatial variation of interaural time difference and suggests uniform just-noticeable differences in interaural time difference.

Authors:  Rosanna C G Smith; Stephen R Price
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.