Literature DB >> 6724832

Contrast sensitivity loss in multiple sclerosis. Selectivity by eye, orientation, and spatial frequency measured with the evoked potential.

M J Kupersmith, W H Seiple, J I Nelson, R E Carr.   

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis can produce highly selective losses in visual function. Psychophysical studies have demonstrated contrast sensitivity deficits for spatial frequencies or for stimulus orientations. Using real-time lock-in retrieval of the visual evoked potential, the authors measured contrast sensitivity in 15 cases with probable or definite multiple sclerosis and acuities of 20/40 or better. Sine-wave grating contrast threshold determinations for three spatial frequencies (1, 4, and 8 cycles/deg) and four orientations (0, 45, 90, and 135 deg) revealed contrast deficits in at least one spatial frequency and orientation in every case. In most cases the visual losses were spotty or multifocal, and not the same in both eyes. Some cases with highly selective patterns of orientation or spatial frequency losses were observed and are discussed in terms of involvement of cortical functional architecture in the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6724832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  10 in total

1.  Visual function in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  B Ashworth; P A Aspinall; J D Mitchell
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Evaluation of optic neuropathy in multiple sclerosis using low-contrast visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  M J Thurtell; E Bala; S S Yaniglos; J C Rucker; N S Peachey; R J Leigh
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  TuebingenCSTest - a useful method to assess the contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Tim Schilling; Arne Ohlendorf; Alexander Leube; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  First-order Wiener kernel visually evoked potentials obtained from multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  D V Schoon; E K Wong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 5.  Vision in multiple sclerosis: the story, structure-function correlations, and models for neuroprotection.

Authors:  Reiko E Sakai; Daniel J Feller; Kristin M Galetta; Steven L Galetta; Laura J Balcer
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  The rapid assessment of visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  S Della Sala; G Comi; V Martinelli; L Somazzi; A J Wilkins
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Influence of multiple sclerosis, age and degree of disability, in the position of the contrast sensitivity curve peak.

Authors:  A F Nunes; P M L Monteiro; M Vaz Pato
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.

Authors:  Steven M Thurman; Pinakin Gunvant Davey; Kaydee Lynn McCray; Violeta Paronian; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Laura J Balcer; Jenelle Raynowska; Rachel Nolan; Steven L Galetta; Raju Kapoor; Ralph Benedict; Glenn Phillips; Nicholas LaRocca; Lynn Hudson; Richard Rudick
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Improved characterization of visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis by topographic analysis.

Authors:  Martin Hardmeier; Florian Hatz; Yvonne Naegelin; Darren Hight; Christian Schindler; Ludwig Kappos; Margitta Seeck; Christoph M Michel; Peter Fuhr
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.020

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.