Literature DB >> 19949031

Evaluation of optic neuropathy in multiple sclerosis using low-contrast visual evoked potentials.

M J Thurtell1, E Bala, S S Yaniglos, J C Rucker, N S Peachey, R J Leigh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrast acuity (identification of low-contrast letters on a white background) is frequently reduced in patients with demyelinating optic neuropathy associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), even when high-contrast (Snellen) visual acuity is normal. Since visual evoked potentials (VEPs) induced with high-contrast pattern-reversal stimuli are typically increased in latency in demyelinating optic neuropathy, we asked if VEPs induced with low-contrast stimuli would be more prolonged and thus helpful in identifying demyelinating optic neuropathy in MS.
METHODS: We studied 15 patients with clinically definite MS and 15 age-matched normal controls. All subjects underwent a neuro-ophthalmologic assessment, including measurement of high-contrast visual acuity and low-contrast acuities with 25%, 10%, 5%, 2.5%, and 1.25% contrast Sloan charts. In patients with MS, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was determined using optical coherence tomography. Monocular VEPs were induced using pattern-reversal checkerboard stimuli with 100% and 10% contrast between checks, at 5 spatial frequencies (8-130 minutes of arc).
RESULTS: VEP latencies were significantly increased in response to low- compared with high-contrast stimuli in both groups. VEP latencies were significantly greater in patients with MS than controls for both high- and low-contrast stimuli. VEP latencies correlated with high- and low-contrast visual acuities and RNFL thickness. VEPs were less likely to be induced with low- than with high-contrast stimuli in eyes with severe residual visual loss.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual evoked potentials obtained in patients with multiple sclerosis using low-contrast stimuli are increased in latency or absent when compared with those obtained using high-contrast stimuli and, thus, may prove to be helpful in identifying demyelinating optic neuropathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19949031      PMCID: PMC2788801          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c3fd43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  26 in total

1.  Human VEP contrast modulation sensitivity: separation of magno- and parvocellular components.

Authors:  J I Nelson; W H Seiple
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  The ocular manifestations of multiple sclerosis. 1. Abnormalities of the afferent visual system.

Authors:  W I McDonald; D Barnes
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Luminance and chromatic modulation sensitivity of macaque ganglion cells and human observers.

Authors:  B B Lee; J Pokorny; V C Smith; P R Martin; A Valberg
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 4.  Visual sensitivity and parallel retinocortical channels.

Authors:  R Shapley
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Separate magnocellular and parvocellular contributions from temporal analysis of the multifocal VEP.

Authors:  A Klistorner; D P Crewther; S G Crewther
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Subclinical visual involvement in multiple sclerosis: a study by MRI, VEPs, frequency-doubling perimetry, standard perimetry, and contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Dario Sisto; Maria Trojano; Michele Vetrugno; Tiziana Trabucco; Giovanni Iliceto; Carlo Sborgia
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Optic neuritis or multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J F Kurtzke
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1985-07

8.  Contrast sensitivity measurements in acute and resolved optic neuritis.

Authors:  R W Beck; M C Ruchman; P J Savino; N J Schatz
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Low-contrast letter acuity testing captures visual dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M L Baier; G R Cutter; R A Rudick; D Miller; J A Cohen; B Weinstock-Guttman; M Mass; L J Balcer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Retinal and cortical evoked responses to chromatic contrast stimuli. Specific losses in both eyes of patients with multiple sclerosis and unilateral optic neuritis.

Authors:  V Porciatti; F Sartucci
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Repair in Multiple Sclerosis: Outcomes for Phase II Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Maria Pia Sormani; Matteo Pardini
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Multifocal visual evoked potentials are influenced by variable contrast stimulation in MS.

Authors:  Audrey R Frohman; Zane Schnurman; Amy Conger; Darrel Conger; Shin Beh; Benjamin Greenberg; Erich Sutter; Peter A Calabresi; Laura J Balcer; Teresa C Frohman; Elliot M Frohman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Vision in multiple sclerosis: the story, structure-function correlations, and models for neuroprotection.

Authors:  Reiko E Sakai; Daniel J Feller; Kristin M Galetta; Steven L Galetta; Laura J Balcer
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  White matter and cognition: making the connection.

Authors:  Christopher M Filley; R Douglas Fields
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Comparing Colored and White-Black Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

Authors:  Erkan Acar; Aysun Soysal; Mesude Tütüncü; Zeynep Özdemir; Selin Kaya; Nilüfer Kale
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.339

6.  Functional assessment of magno, parvo and konio-cellular pathways; current state and future clinical applications.

Authors:  Ali Yoonessi; Ahmad Yoonessi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2011-04

7.  Predicting Neural Response Latency of the Human Early Visual Cortex from MRI-Based Tissue Measurements of the Optic Radiation.

Authors:  Hiromasa Takemura; Kenichi Yuasa; Kaoru Amano
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-07-02

8.  Low Contrast Visual Acuity Might Help to Detect Previous Optic Neuritis.

Authors:  Soo-Hyun Park; Choul Yong Park; Young Joo Shin; Kyoung Sook Jeong; Nam-Hee Kim
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Improved characterization of visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis by topographic analysis.

Authors:  Martin Hardmeier; Florian Hatz; Yvonne Naegelin; Darren Hight; Christian Schindler; Ludwig Kappos; Margitta Seeck; Christoph M Michel; Peter Fuhr
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 10.  Clinical electrophysiology of the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Oliver R Marmoy; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.