Literature DB >> 6722695

Prenatal risk assessment and obstetric care in a small rural hospital: comparison with guidelines.

R I Casson, E S Sennett.   

Abstract

An assessment was made of the potential usefulness in a small rural hospital of the guidelines for prenatal risk assessment and management of the Newfoundland and Labrador Prenatal Record, a form similar to that in use in other provinces. A retrospective chart review was done for 266 pregnancies followed at the Baie Verte Peninsula Health Centre prior to the introduction of the guidelines. The pattern of practice was to request consultation and to transfer patients for delivery less often than was suggested by the guidelines; only 32% of patients at risk were assessed by an obstetrician. By the time of delivery only 39% of the patients were at no predictable risk according to the guidelines. Nevertheless, neonatal morbidity was present in this group (4% of the infants had an Apgar score of 6 or less at 1 or 5 minutes), though less often than in those at risk (18% of the infants had a low Apgar score). However, the group at no predictable risk required nonelective intervention in 40% of cases, approximately the same rate as that for the group at risk. It is necessary for some small hospitals to have the facilities and the trained staff to handle the problems that occur even in low-risk patients. To maintain the delivery rate necessary to retain skills, the guidelines may help family practitioners and consulting obstetricians to select some patients at risk who can be managed in small hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6722695      PMCID: PMC1483523     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  26 in total

1.  The general practitioner's role in the management of labour.

Authors:  P Curzen; U M Mountrose
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-12-11

2.  A study of the relationship between Goodwin's high-risk score and fetal outcome.

Authors:  S Y Yeh; A Forsythe; R I Lowensohn; E H Hon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-01-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Toward improving the outcome of pregnancy Recommendations for the regional development of perinatal health services.

Authors:  G M Ryan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Critical appraisal of domiciliary obstetric and neonatal practice.

Authors:  C A Cox; S S Fox; P M Zinkin; A E Matthews
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-01-10

5.  Progress in "regionalization" of perinatal care.

Authors:  A J Salisbury
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 3.430

6.  Antepartum identification of the fetus at risk.

Authors:  J W Goodwin; J T Dunne; B W Thomas
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1969-10-18       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  A simplified antepartum high-risk pregnancy scoring form: statistical analysis of 5459 cases.

Authors:  A T Coopland; L J Peddle; T F Baskett; R Rollwagen; A Simpson; E Parker
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1977-05-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy.

Authors:  P White
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 3.430

9.  High-risk pregnancy. Unresolved problems of screening, management, and prognosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M Klein; I Lloyd; C Redman; M Bull; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  Electronic fetal monitoring in a small hospital. Part 2: intrapartum use.

Authors:  R I Casson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Obstetrical practice and training in canadian family medicine: conserving an endangered species.

Authors:  M Klein; J L Reynolds; F Boucher; M Malus; E Rosenberg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Small Hospital Medical Services in Ontario: Part 3: Obstetric services.

Authors:  J Rourke
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Babes in the woods: teaching the use of the vacuum extractor.

Authors:  C R Wilson; R I Casson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Referral pattern and rate of intervention in a small rural obstetrical practice.

Authors:  J Lemelin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Are rural general practitioner--obstetricians performing too many prenatal ultrasound examinations? Evidence from western Labrador.

Authors:  E Thompson; D Freake; G Worrall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Intrapartum obstetrical consultation in a rural hospital.

Authors:  T K Bakshi
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  The case for small rural hospital obstetrics.

Authors:  W Hogg; J Lemelin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.275

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.