Literature DB >> 6701302

Magnetic resonance imaging: effects of magnetic field strength.

L E Crooks, M Arakawa, J Hoenninger, B McCarten, J Watts, L Kaufman.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance images of the head, abdomen, and pelvis of normal adult men were obtained using varying magnetic field strength, and measurements of T1 and T2 relaxations and of signal-to-noise (SN) ratios were determined. The T1 relaxation of gray matter, white matter, and muscle increases and T2 decreases with field strength, while T1 of fat remains relatively constant and T2 increases. As a consequence, for any one spin echo sequence, gray/white matter contrast decreases and muscle/fat contrast increases with field. SN levels rise rapidly up to 3.0 kgauss and then change more slowly, actually dropping for muscle. The optimum field for magnetic resonance imaging depends on tissue type, body part, and imaging sequence, so that it does not have a unique value. Magnetic resonance systems that operate in the 3.0-5.0 kgauss range achieve most or all of the gains that can be achieved by higher magnetic fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6701302     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.151.1.6701302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: field strength related variance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) scalars.

Authors:  Thierry A G M Huisman; Thomas Loenneker; Gerd Barta; Matthias E Bellemann; Juergen Hennig; Joachim E Fischer; Kamil A Il'yasov
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  NMR instrumentation and hardware available at present and in the future.

Authors:  E W McFarland; B R Rosen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  NODDI reproducibility and variability with magnetic field strength: A comparison between 1.5 T and 3 T.

Authors:  Ai Wern Chung; Kiran K Seunarine; Chris A Clark
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Basic principles of magnetic resonance imaging--an update.

Authors:  A L Scherzinger; W R Hendee
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-12

5.  Breast cancer: evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 3.0-T MR imaging.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Shadfar Bahri; Rita S Mehta; Aida Kuzucan; Hon J Yu; Philip M Carpenter; Stephen A Feig; Muqing Lin; David J B Hsiang; Karen T Lane; John A Butler; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Effect of flip angle on the accuracy and repeatability of hepatic proton density fat fraction estimation by complex data-based, T1-independent, T2*-corrected, spectrum-modeled MRI.

Authors:  Benjamin L Johnson; Michael E Schroeder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Gavin Hamilton; Masoud Shiehmorteza; Rohit Loomba; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Scott Reeder; Michael S Middleton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Changes in magnetic resonance imaging relaxation time on postmortem magnetic resonance imaging of formalin-fixed human normal heart tissue.

Authors:  Kiyokadzu Ebata; Sakon Noriki; Kunihiro Inai; Hirohiko Kimura
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 1.930

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.