| Literature DB >> 34556039 |
Kiyokadzu Ebata1,2,3, Sakon Noriki4,5, Kunihiro Inai6,5, Hirohiko Kimura7,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to investigate the cause of death, but due to time constraints, it is not widely applied to the heart. Therefore, MRI analysis of the heart after formalin fixation was previously performed. However, the changes in MRI signal values based on the fixation time of formalin were not investigated. The objective was to investigate changes over time in the T1- and T2-values of MRI signals in normal areas of hearts removed during autopsy, hearts subsequently fixed in formalin, and heart specimens sliced for the preparation of pathological specimens.Entities:
Keywords: Autopsy; Cause of death; Formalin fixation; Heart; Magnetic resonance imaging; Relaxation time
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34556039 PMCID: PMC8459544 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00666-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 1.930
List of autopsy and PM-MRI cases
| Case no | Sex | Age (years) | Raw scan | Pre-cut scan (day) | Post-cut scan (day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 01 | M | 59 | ○(216) | ||
| Case 02 | M | 72 | ○ | ○(10) | ○(72) |
| Case 03 | M | 71 | ○ | ○(177) | |
| Case 04 | M | 92 | ○(137) | ||
| Case 05 | M | 62 | ○(43) | ||
| Case 06 | F | 79 | ○(15) | ○(81) | |
| Case 07 | M | 78 | ○(23) | ○(78) | |
| Case 08 | M | 70 | ○ | ○(15) | ○(67) |
| Case 09 | F | 76 | ○ | ○(18) | ○(41) |
| Case 10 | M | 59 | ○ | ○(16) | ○(53) |
| Case 11 | F | 59 | ○ | ○(14) | ○(32) |
| Case 12 | M | 76 | ○ | ○(18) | |
| Case 13 | M | 20 | ○(14) | ||
| Case 14 | F | 48 | ○(25) | ||
| Case 15 | F | 9 | ○(46) | ||
| Case 16 | M | 91 | ○(12,19.27,33,40) | ○(59,82,108,121) | |
| Case 17 | F | 75 | ○(6,15,25,34,49,71) | ||
| Case 18 | M | 75 | ○(3,5,7,10,12,14,26) | ○(39) | |
| Case 19 | F | 52 | ○ | ○(5,7,14) | ○(37) |
| Case 20 | M | 72 | ○ | ○(3,5,8,10,17) | ○(19,39) |
| Case 21 | M | 71 | ○ | ○(7,10) |
Raw scan: MRI scanned after the heart had been washed out with physiological saline immediately after removal
Pre-cut scan: MRI scanned with the formalin-fixed heart thoroughly immersed in formalin solution
Post-cut scan: MRI scanned after the fixed heart had been sliced, with the specimen closest to the papillary muscles chosen for scanning by the same method as the raw and pre-cut scans
M: F = 14:7 Age (y), mean (SD) = 65.0 ± 19.7
Pre-cut scan (day): scan day from death, mean (SD) = 15.4 ± 10.0
Post-cut scan (day): scan day from death, mean (SD) = 68.0 ± 49.6
Fig. 1a External view of the MRI scanner. b QD coil. c Formalin-fixed heart. d Sliced heart
PM-MRI Parameters. MRI pulse sequence scanning conditions
| T1-value | T2-value | |
|---|---|---|
| TR | 3000 | 3000 |
| TE | 10.0 | Table |
| TI | Table | – |
| FA | 90 | 90 |
| Thickness | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| FOV | 200 | 200 |
| Scan time | 6′15″ × 15 | 6′28″ × 12 |
TR: time of repeat (millisecond)
TE: echo time (millisecond)
TI: inversion time (millisecond)
FA: flip angle (degree)
FOV: field of view (millimeter)
PM-MRI parameters. TI and TE assigned for signal acquisition to obtain T1 and T2-values
Fig. 2Case 9 a T1-value image Raw scan TI = 1000 ms. b T1-value image Pre-cut scan (18 days) TI = 1000 ms. c T1-value image Post-cut scan (41 days) TE = 200 ms d T2-value image Raw scan TE = 200 ms. e T2-value image Pre-cut scan (18 days) TE = 200 ms. f T2-value image Post-cut scan (41 days) TE = 200 ms
Fig. 3Case 9 a Sliced specimen. b Sampling. c Magnified view. The red circle indicates the ROI
T1- and T2-values of each case
| Scan-timing | Case | T1-value | Median / mean ± SD | T2-value | Median/ mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw scan | 2 | 427.9 | 411.7/407.5 ± 21.6 | 77.1 | 77.1/77.6 ± 6.0 |
| 3 | 411.7 | 78.7 | |||
| 8 | 453.3 | 87.6 | |||
| 9 | 374.3 | 69.0 | |||
| 10 | 383.5 | 76.0 | |||
| 11 | 418.5 | 62.4 | |||
| 12 | 409.7 | 73.9 | |||
| 17 | 349.7 | 74.5 | |||
| 19 | 403.4 | 84.6 | |||
| 20 | 421.7 | 82.7 | |||
| 21 | 428.4 | 87.2 | |||
| Pre-cut scan | 2 | 213.3 | 226.7/223.2 ± 16.0 | 59.7 | 54.4/55.2 ± 3.2 |
| 6 | 258.1 | 54.1 | |||
| 7 | 224.0 | 59.6 | |||
| 8 | 225.6 | 53.6 | |||
| 9 | 195.2 | 52.6 | |||
| 10 | 231.2 | 52.3 | |||
| 11 | 204.4 | 62.5 | |||
| 12 | 227.8 | 61.5 | |||
| 13 | 234.0 | 51.0 | |||
| 14 | 193.8 | 51.4 | |||
| 15 | 196.1 | 52.4 | |||
| 16* | 208.2 | 54.6 | |||
| 18* | 235.6 | 58.2 | |||
| 19* | 231.7 | 54.6 | |||
| 20* | 254.7 | 55.1 | |||
| 21* | 238.0 | 50.5 | |||
| Post-cut scan | 1 | 135.5 | 172.5/175.4 ± 21.3 | 47.3 | 51.6/53.4 ± 4.7 |
| 2 | 144.9 | 47.8 | |||
| 3 | 133.8 | 50.1 | |||
| 4 | 159.0 | 60.0 | |||
| 5 | 160.5 | 49.3 | |||
| 6 | 165.2 | 53.0 | |||
| 7 | 167.9 | 57.6 | |||
| 8 | 194.7 | 65.0 | |||
| 10 | 166.5 | 48.9 | |||
| 11 | 178.3 | 49.5 | |||
| 12 | 178.8 | 61.5 | |||
| 16* | 177.0 | 48.3 | |||
| 17* | 221.8 | 57.3 | |||
| 18 | 210.0 | 55.0 | |||
| 19 | 220.0 | 49.0 | |||
| 20* | 192.7 | 55.1 |
*Consecutive scans were performed under the same conditions. The signal averages of 22 Pre-cut scans of these 5 specimens were taken. The signal averages of 12 Post-cut scans of these 3 specimens were taken (See Table 1)
Fig. 4Changes over time in T1-values from organ removal to scanning
Fig. 5Changes over time in T2-values from organ removal to scanning