Literature DB >> 6691266

Determination of cardiac output by transcutaneous continuous-wave ultrasonic Doppler computer.

P A Chandraratna, M Nanna, C McKay, A Nimalasuriya, R Swinney, U Elkayam, S H Rahimtoola.   

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of a new, portable, continuous-wave Doppler computer (Ultracom) in measuring cardiac output (CO), simultaneous thermodilution CO and Doppler CO were measured in triplicate in 39 selected patients. Technically adequate Doppler CO studies were obtained in 36 patients. Aortic root diameter was measured by echocardiography and the cross-sectional area was calculated. A continuous-wave Doppler transducer was placed in the suprasternal notch, directed toward the ascending aorta and angled until the maximal velocity signal was achieved. The systolic velocity integral was computed using fast Fourier transform technique. The Doppler CO was computed from the equation: CO = aortic cross-sectional area X systolic velocity integral X heart rate. Interobserver and intraobserver variability studies were also performed. CO measured by thermodilution ranged from 1.86 to 10.1 liters/min (mean 5.26 +/- 1.91 [+/- standard deviation]) and CO by the Doppler method ranged from 1.63 to 10.9 liters/min (mean 5.32 +/- 1.83). The correlation coefficient was 0.97 (p less than 0.001) and standard error of the estimate was 0.42. The regression equation showed that Doppler CO = 0.408 + 0.93 X thermodilution CO. The correlation in 29 volunteers for interobserver variability was 0.98 (p less than 0.001) and in 18 volunteers for intraobserver variability was 0.97 (p less than 0.001). Thus, CO can be determined accurately in many patients using this Doppler technique by trained and experienced persons; intra- and interobserver variability is small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6691266     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90718-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  24 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac output in 1998.

Authors:  M Singer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Non-invasive methods of measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  G J Dobb; K D Donovan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Effect of age and blood pressure on aortic size and stroke distance.

Authors:  B A Towfiq; J Weir; J M Rawles
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-06

4.  Reproducibility of cardiac output measurement by cross sectional and Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  S C Robson; A Murray; I Peart; A Heads; S Hunter
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-06

5.  Reproducibility of linear cardiac output measurement by Doppler ultrasound alone.

Authors:  F M McLennan; N E Haites; J D Mackenzie; M K Daniel; J M Rawles
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-01

Review 6.  Echocardiography.

Authors:  J B Chambers; M J Monaghan; G Jackson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-29

Review 7.  Assessment of cardiac hemodynamics and valvular function by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  D C Wallerson; J Dubin; R B Devereux
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1987-10

8.  Genesis of Still's murmurs: a controlled Doppler echocardiographic study.

Authors:  H M Gardiner; H S Joffe
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-09

9.  Validation of the beat to beat measurement of blood velocity in the human ascending aorta by a new high temporal resolution Doppler ultrasound spectral analyser.

Authors:  A J Coats; C Murphy; J Conway; P Sleight
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-08

10.  Cardiac stroke volume during exercise measured by Doppler echocardiography: comparison with the thermodilution technique and evaluation of reproducibility.

Authors:  H Ihlen; K Endresen; S Golf; S Nitter-Hauge
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.