Literature DB >> 6687893

Intensity discrimination with cochlear implants.

B E Pfingst, P A Burnett, D Sutton.   

Abstract

Intensity difference limens were measured for various frequencies and intensities of sinusoidal and pulsatile electrical stimulation in monkeys with electrodes implanted in the scala tympani, scala vestibuli, modiolus, or middle ear. Difference limens decreased, as a function of initial stimulus intensity, from values of 1.5-3 dB near threshold to as low as 0.5 dB near the upper limit of the dynamic range. If sensation level was held constant, difference limens decreased as a function of frequency up to about 500 Hz, and then remained constant. They were similar across a variety of electrode placements and separations if differences in threshold and dynamic range were taken into account. However, difference limens measured in severely damaged ears were slightly smaller than those in moderately damaged ears. The near miss to Weber's law, characteristic of acoustic difference limens, was not seen with electrical stimuli. Differences limens for electrical stimuli were roughly one-half those for acoustic stimuli; thus, part of the deficit in dynamic range for electrical stimulation compared with acoustic stimulation is countered by the smaller intensity differences limens for electrical stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6687893     DOI: 10.1121/1.389277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Current-level discrimination in the context of interleaved, multichannel stimulation in cochlear implants: effects of number of stimulated electrodes, pulse rate, and electrode separation.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-21

2.  Spatially distinct functional output regions within the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; David J Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Teresa A Zwolan; Li Xu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Auditory midbrain implant: a review.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-09

5.  Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms.

Authors:  Tiffany Elise H Chua; Mark Bachman; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Current-level discrimination and spectral profile analysis in multi-channel electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue: Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation.

Authors:  Cecil A Lozano; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Marco Santello
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.111

8.  Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Impact of Aging and the Electrode-to-Neural Interface on Temporal Processing Ability in Cochlear-Implant Users: Gap Detection Thresholds.

Authors:  Maureen J Shader; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.