Literature DB >> 6664482

Feature similarity and laterality effects in visual masking.

J B Hellige.   

Abstract

Observers attempted to recognize single letters presented to the left or right visual field when preceded or followed by a masking stimulus. When the masking stimulus contained features identical to those of the target letter, there was a left visual field (right hemisphere) advantage for target recognition. When the target and mask contained extremely different features, the opposite visual field advantage was obtained. Implications are discussed for models of hemispheric asymmetry and for interpreting visual laterality studies that use masks to reduce the overall level of performance.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6664482     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(83)90061-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  8 in total

1.  The left visual-field advantage in rapid visual presentation is amplified rather than reduced by posterior-parietal rTMS.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Friderike Möller; Michał Kuniecki; Kamila Smigasiewicz; Sergiu Groppa; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effects of hemispheric differences on feature perturbations.

Authors:  J Polich; K D Mackie; K M Spencer; K Ohashi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1991

3.  Hemispheric differences in visual search of simple line arrays.

Authors:  J Polich; D P DeFrancesco; J F Garon; W Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

4.  Attentional selection of relative SF mediates global versus local processing: evidence from EEG.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Shlomo Bentin; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Hemispheric differences for feature perception.

Authors:  J Polich; D L Crossman; D P DeFrancesco
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1988

6.  Attending to global versus local stimulus features modulates neural processing of low versus high spatial frequencies: an analysis with event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Antigona Martínez; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-09

7.  No prior entry for threat-related faces: evidence from temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Antonio Schettino; Tom Loeys; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Get Set or Get Distracted? Disentangling Content-Priming and Attention-Catching Effects of Background Lure Stimuli on Identifying Targets in Two Simultaneously Presented Series.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Kamila Śmigasiewicz; Lars Michael; Laura Heikaus; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.