Literature DB >> 20401472

The left visual-field advantage in rapid visual presentation is amplified rather than reduced by posterior-parietal rTMS.

Rolf Verleger1, Friderike Möller, Michał Kuniecki, Kamila Smigasiewicz, Sergiu Groppa, Hartwig R Siebner.   

Abstract

In the present task, series of visual stimuli are rapidly presented left and right, containing two target stimuli, T1 and T2. In previous studies, T2 was better identified in the left than in the right visual field. This advantage of the left visual field might reflect dominance exerted by the right over the left hemisphere. If so, then repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the right parietal cortex might release the left hemisphere from right-hemispheric control, thereby improving T2 identification in the right visual field. Alternatively or additionally, the asymmetry in T2 identification might reflect capacity limitations of the left hemisphere, which might be aggravated by rTMS to the left parietal cortex. Therefore, rTMS pulses were applied during each trial, beginning simultaneously with T1 presentation. rTMS was directed either to P4 or to P3 (right or left parietal cortex) either as effective or as sham stimulation. In two experiments, either one of these two factors, hemisphere and effectiveness of rTMS, was varied within or between participants. Again, T2 was much better identified in the left than in the right visual field. This advantage of the left visual field was indeed modified by rTMS, being further increased by rTMS to the left hemisphere rather than being reduced by rTMS to the right. It may be concluded that superiority of the right hemisphere in this task implies that this hemisphere is less irritable by external interference than the left hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20401472     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2237-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Modulation of excitatory and inhibitory circuits for visual awareness in the human right parietal cortex.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Massimiliano Oliveri; Sara Torriero; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Attenuating illusory binding with TMS of the right parietal cortex.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Timothy Verstynen; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Bihemispheric leftward bias in a visuospatial attention-related network.

Authors:  Tali Siman-Tov; Avi Mendelsohn; Tom Schonberg; Galia Avidan; Ilana Podlipsky; Luiz Pessoa; Natan Gadoth; Leslie G Ungerleider; Talma Hendler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Mind your left: spatial bias in subcortical fear processing.

Authors:  Tali Siman-Tov; David Papo; Natan Gadoth; Tom Schonberg; Avi Mendelsohn; Daniella Perry; Talma Hendler
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  A C Nobre; G N Sebestyen; D R Gitelman; M M Mesulam; R S Frackowiak; C D Frith
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  A PET study of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  M Corbetta; F M Miezin; G L Shulman; S E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Feature similarity and laterality effects in visual masking.

Authors:  J B Hellige
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Sex hormonal modulation of hemispheric asymmetries in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Antje Holländer; Markus Hausmann; Jeff P Hamm; Michael C Corballis
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  The role of the parietal lobe in visual extinction studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Lorella Battelli; George A Alvarez; Thomas Carlson; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Effects of rTMS conditioning over the fronto-parietal network on motor versus visual attention.

Authors:  Elisabeth Rounis; Kielan Yarrow; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  9 in total

1.  Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Chang; Tzu-Yu Hsu; Philip Tseng; Wei-Kuang Liang; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neuro-cognitive mechanisms of conscious and unconscious visual perception: From a plethora of phenomena to general principles.

Authors:  Markus Kiefer; Ulrich Ansorge; John-Dylan Haynes; Fred Hamker; Uwe Mattler; Rolf Verleger; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-01

3.  Good vibrations, bad vibrations: Oscillatory brain activity in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Jolanda Janson; Cornelia Kranczioch
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-22

4.  Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes.

Authors:  Dariusz Asanowicz; Kamila Smigasiewicz; Rolf Verleger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-19

5.  Hemispheric asymmetry in the auditory facilitation effect in dual-stream rapid serial visual presentation tasks.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Takeshima; Jiro Gyoba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cooperation or competition of the two hemispheres in processing characters presented at vertical midline.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Marie Dittmer; Kamila Smigasiewicz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Brain lateralization and self-reported symptoms of ADHD in a population sample of adults: a dimensional approach.

Authors:  Saleh M H Mohamed; Norbert A Börger; Reint H Geuze; Jaap J van der Meere
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-22

8.  The whole is faster than its parts: evidence for temporally independent attention to distinct spatial locations.

Authors:  Andrew Clement; Nestor Matthews
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Get Set or Get Distracted? Disentangling Content-Priming and Attention-Catching Effects of Background Lure Stimuli on Identifying Targets in Two Simultaneously Presented Series.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Kamila Śmigasiewicz; Lars Michael; Laura Heikaus; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.