Literature DB >> 6663369

Eye movements and neural remapping during fusion of misaligned random-dot stereograms.

M T Hyson, B Julesz, D H Fender.   

Abstract

Fender and Julesz [J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 819 (1967)] found that fused retinally stabilized binocular line targets could be misaligned on the two retinas in the temporalward direction by at least 30 min of arc without loss of fusion and stereopsis and that random-dot stereograms could be misaligned 2 deg before fusion was lost. To test these results in normal vision, we recorded eye motions of four observers while they viewed a random-dot stereogram that subtended about 10 deg. The observers misaligned overlaid vectograph stereo images by moving them apart in a temporalward direction until fusion was lost. They then returned the vectographs to the overlaid position. Throughout this cycle the observers reported at frequent intervals if they could perceive strong or weak depth, loss of depth, or loss of fusion. For some observers the image separation could be increased to 5 deg beyond parallel before fusion was lost. The visual axes diverged to follow the image centers and varied from overconverged to overdiverged with respect to the image centers while the observers still reported depth and fusion. We call the difference between the image separation and eye vergence the vergence error. If a vergence error persisted for at least 10 sec without loss of the percepts of fusion and depth, we postulate that neutral remapping occurred that compensated for the retinal misalignment. We found that the average maximum neural remapping was 3.0 deg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6663369     DOI: 10.1364/josa.73.001665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am        ISSN: 0030-3941


  8 in total

1.  Hysteresis, cooperativity, and depth averaging in dynamic random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  B L Anderson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-06

2.  Binocular combination of phase and contrast explained by a gain-control and gain-enhancement model.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Vergence amplitudes with random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  S M Archer; K K Miller; E M Helveston; F D Ellis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Adaptation of ocular vergence to stimulation with large disparities.

Authors:  C J Erkelens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Field processes in stereovision. A description of stereopsis appropriate to ophthalmology and visual perception.

Authors:  T Shipley
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Interhemispherical comparisons in the processing of contour and random texture sinewave stereograms.

Authors:  T Shipley; R Garfinkel; P van Houten
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-11-15       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  A unified model for binocular fusion and depth perception.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Karel Fliegel; Ladislav Dusek; Tomas Lukes; Jan Hejda; Michaela Duchackova; Jiri Hozman; Rudolf Autrata
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 0.957

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.