Literature DB >> 6655427

Gerbils in space: performance on the 17-arm radial maze.

D M Wilkie, P Slobin.   

Abstract

In Experiment 1 six hungry gerbils received six trials per day on a 17-arm radial maze. During each trial the subjects were allowed to choose freely among the arms, each of which contained a food pellet, until each arm had been visited once or until eight minutes had elapsed. An error was recorded when the subject entered a previously visited arm. The gerbils quickly learned not to re-enter previously visited arms and generally made errors on fewer than 15% of entries, performance comparable to that of the rat and superior to that of other species tested in the radial arm maze. The intertrial-interval duration did not affect accuracy of arm choices during acquisition but did influence asymptotic accuracy. Accuracy did not change systematically over the six trials. A high proportion of arm entries were to nearby arms. Errors occurred most often towards the end of a trial. Odor cues were not important. When the number of trials per day was reduced from six to one, accuracy deteriorated slightly. In Experiment 2 neither the transposition of extramaze cues nor the placement of the maze in a different room had large disruptive effects on accuracy. In Experiment 3 the addition of three explicit intramaze brightness cues aided accuracy, perhaps by permitting the subjects to decompose the large maze into three smaller mazes, although there was no direct evidence that this was the case. Implications of a number of these results for models of spatial maze performance were discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6655427      PMCID: PMC1347940          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  PHYLETIC DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING.

Authors:  M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1965-06

2.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Discrimination of cues in mazes: a resolution of the place-vs.-response question.

Authors:  F RESTLE
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Domestication.

Authors:  R Boice
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  The rodentia as omnivores.

Authors:  S O Landry
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 4.875

6.  Failure of mice to demonstrate spatial memory in the radial maze.

Authors:  S J Mizumori; M R Rosenzweig; M G Kermisch
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1982-05

7.  How marsh tits find their hoards: the roles of site preference and spatial memory.

Authors:  S J Shettleworth; J R Krebs
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1982-10

8.  Mazes, maps, and memory.

Authors:  D S Olton
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1979-07

9.  Spatial knowledge and geometric representation in a child blind from birth.

Authors:  B Landau; H Gleitman; E Spelke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Behavior and spatial learning in radial mazes in birds.

Authors:  M G Pleskacheva
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-09-23

Review 2.  Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Transient forebrain ischemia induces impairment in cognitive performance prior to extensive neuronal cell death in Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus).

Authors:  Tomohiro Kondo; Suguru Yoshida; Hiroaki Nagai; Ai Takeshita; Masaki Mino; Hiroshi Morioka; Takayuki Nakajima; Ken Takeshi Kusakabe; Toshiya Okada
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 1.672

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.