Literature DB >> 3080792

Incorporating outcome standards into perinatal regulations.

B J Turnock, J W Masterson.   

Abstract

State and local governments license and monitor hospitals to ensure that a minimum acceptable level of care is present as one means of improving the outcomes and health status of patients served. Standards developed to achieve these purposes, however, have focused almost exclusively on the inputs and processes believed to be necessary for quality care and optimal services. Even when the overwhelming consensus of professionals and providers is that such standards impact positively on outcomes, direct evidence of such causal relationships is often lacking. In 1983, the Chicago Department of Health began incorporating direct measurement of outcomes into its mandated regulatory functions for one operating unit of hospitals--the maternity and newborn services. Crude perinatal and neonatal mortality rates for Chicago hospitals are adjusted using an indirect standardization process that controls for both race and birth weight. This process allows for the calculation of adjusted mortality rates and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) that are used as an initial screening instrument. Additional evaluation and investigation activities are then directed to hospitals identified through the initial screening process as meriting further study. Hospitals are also evaluated for compliance with the traditional standards and requirements. Information derived from both outcome and compliance evaluations is used to determine monitoring and regulatory activities such as penalties, waivers, and periodicity of future inspections. Use of this Outcome-Oriented Perinatal Surveillance System appears to be an objective, understandable, and acceptable basis for establishing monitoring, evaluation, and regulatory strategies for hospitals with maternity and newborn units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3080792      PMCID: PMC1477648     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  6 in total

1.  Determinants of the neonatal mortality.

Authors:  K Lee; P I Tseng; A I Eidelman; S R Kandall; L M Gartner
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1976-08

2.  Approaches to reducing infant mortality in Illinois.

Authors:  B J Turnock; L McGill
Journal:  IMJ Ill Med J       Date:  1983-06

3.  Perinatal mortality: standardizing for birthweight is biased.

Authors:  A J Wilcox; I T Russell
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Decline in neonatal mortality, 1968 to 1977: better babies or better care?

Authors:  R J David; E Siegel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Differences among hospitals as a source of excess neonatal mortality: the District of Columbia, 1970-1978.

Authors:  J H Madans; J C Kleinman; S R Machlin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1981

6.  The quality and completeness of birthweight and gestational age data in computerized birth files.

Authors:  R J David
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 9.308

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  A Framework for the Development of maternal quality of care indicators.

Authors:  Lisa M Korst; Kimberly D Gregory; Michael C Lu; Carolina Reyes; Calvin J Hobel; Gilberto F Chavez
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-09

2.  Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization.

Authors:  James M Nicholson
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-20

3.  Active management of risk in nulliparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Morghan H Stenson; Lisa C Kellar; Aaron B Caughey; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The active management of risk in multiparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Aaron B Caughey; Morghan H Stenson; Peter Cronholm; Lisa Kellar; Ian Bennett; Katie Margo; Joseph Stratton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.661

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.