Literature DB >> 1566959

Response comparability of family and staff proxies for nursing home residents.

S L Tennstedt1, K M Skinner, L M Sullivan, J B McKinlay.   

Abstract

Response comparability on a wide variety of factual and judgmental information regarding nursing home residents was assessed for two proxy groups: family and staff. Family proxies had the most information. Family and staff proxies are not interchangeable. A general lack of response comparability suggests that proxies for nursing home residents should be selected in relation to the type of data needed and the time period of interest.

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1566959      PMCID： PMC1694123          DOI： 10.2105/ajph.82.5.747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN： 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  FRED: an innovative approach to nursing home level-of-care assignments.

Authors:  J N Morris; S Sherwood; M I May; E Bernstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  An assessment of the validity of questionnaire responses provided by a surviving spouse.

Authors:  M L Lerchen; J M Samet
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients.

Authors:  E Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Personal versus telephone surveys for collecting household health data at the local level.

Authors:  M F Weeks; R A Kulka; J T Lessler; R W Whitmore
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Retrospective information from questionnaires. I. Comparability of primary respondents and their next-of-kin.

Authors:  N Herrmann
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys.

Authors:  J Siemiatycki
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Systematic biases in functional status assessment of elderly adults: effects of different data sources.

Authors:  L Z Rubenstein; C Schairer; G D Wieland; R Kane
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1984-11

8.  Comparison of self- and surrogate-reported dietary information.

Authors:  C G Humble; J M Samet; B E Skipper
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status.

Authors:  J Magaziner; E M Simonsick; T M Kashner; J R Hebel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.