Literature DB >> 6625386

Barriers to informed consent.

C W Lidz, A Meisel, M Osterweis, J L Holden, J H Marx, M R Munetz.   

Abstract

The law of informed consent seeks to actively involve patients in decision making. Most authorities agree that this involvement has not occurred but disagree about why. Some suggest that patients are incapable of understanding medical issues and others that physicians have not explained issues clearly or extensively enough. We observed decision making in several hospital settings and found other significant barriers to patient participation. These barriers include the fact that treatment decisions take place over a long period; there are often many decisions to be made; although patients want information about treatment, they typically believe that decision making is the physician's task; physicians do not understand the rationale for the patient's role in decisions; and the medical decision-making process often involves so many people that the patient does not know who is responsible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6625386     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-99-4-539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  26 in total

1.  Re-engineering the process of surgical informed consent.

Authors:  M M Dierks; D Z Sands; C Safran
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Jared R Adams; Robert E Drake
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2006-02

3.  A Framework to Improve Surgeon Communication in High-Stakes Surgical Decisions: Best Case/Worst Case.

Authors:  Lauren J Taylor; Michael J Nabozny; Nicole M Steffens; Jennifer L Tucholka; Karen J Brasel; Sara K Johnson; Amy Zelenski; Paul J Rathouz; Qianqian Zhao; Kristine L Kwekkeboom; Toby C Campbell; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Risks of elective cardiac surgery: what do patients want to know?

Authors:  N Beresford; L Seymour; C Vincent; N Moat
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Heart transplantation without informed consent: discussion of a case.

Authors:  A M Grande; M Rinaldi; C Goggi; P Politi; M Viganò
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Consent in medical decision making: the role of communication.

Authors:  W C Wu; R A Pearlman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  The practice of empathy as a prerequisite for informed consent.

Authors:  J E Rosenberg; B Towers
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1986-06

9.  European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: results of an ethical questionnaire.

Authors:  J L Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Assessment of the capacity to consent to treatment in patients admitted to acute medical wards.

Authors:  Sylfa Fassassi; Yanik Bianchi; Friedrich Stiefel; Gérard Waeber
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.