Literature DB >> 10566456

Re-engineering the process of surgical informed consent.

M M Dierks1, D Z Sands, C Safran.   

Abstract

We have created a clinical performance support system that transforms surgical informed consent into an interactive process capable of evolving in response to institution-specified, provider-specified and patient-specified needs. The system functions in several capacities, including: (1) a source of standardized and comprehensive content and format the transmission of procedure-related risk and complications; (2) as expert critique, providing cues in an effort to reduce the effects of biased risk appraisal; (3) captures and archives clinician behavior relating to use, modification and disclosure of standardized knowledge sources; (4) provides just-in-time access to procedural descriptions information relating to risks and complications; (5) captures, archives and makes available to the clinician patient use of procedure-related knowledge resources. By design, the system will be used to assess the relationship between clinician perception and heuristics surrounding risk appraisal and disclosure and patient perceptions based on response to the disclosure process. The system prototype is currently being deployed in a breast surgery unit at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beth Israel Hospital (Boston); Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10566456      PMCID: PMC2232657     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  8 in total

1.  Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.

Authors:  G B Chapman; S J Robbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

Review 2.  Whose consent is it anyway? A poststructuralist framing of the person in medical decision-making.

Authors:  J Marta
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-08

3.  Validation of clinical problems using a UMLS-based semantic parser.

Authors:  H S Goldberg; C Hsu; V Law; C Safran
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

Review 4.  Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy: a control heuristic explanation.

Authors:  S C Thompson; W Armstrong; C Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Primacy effects in clinical judgments of contingency.

Authors:  S P Curley; M J Young; M J Kingry; J F Yates
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1988 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  The display of information and the judgment of contingency.

Authors:  W C Ward; H M Jenkins
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1965-09

Review 7.  Informed consent for clinical trials: in search of the "best" method.

Authors:  S J Edwards; R J Lilford; J Thornton; J Hewison
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Barriers to informed consent.

Authors:  C W Lidz; A Meisel; M Osterweis; J L Holden; J H Marx; M R Munetz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 25.391

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Knowledge and attitude toward informed consent among private dental practitioners in bathinda city, punjab, India.

Authors:  Vivek V Gupta; Nagesh Bhat; Kailash Asawa; Mridula Tak; Salil Bapat; Pulkit Chaturvedi
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2015-02-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.