Literature DB >> 6614032

Evaluation of a method for improving the teaching performance of attending physicians.

K M Skeff.   

Abstract

The effects of an intensive feedback method on the teaching performance of ward attending physicians were evaluated. Sixty-four attending physicians were randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups: (1) intensive feedback, (2) videotape control, (3) questionnaire feedback, or (4) questionnaire control. The method was evaluated using the teachers' subjective assessments, ratings of videotapes of ward rounds, and trainee ratings. Seventy-five percent of the intensive feedback group rated their treatment definitely beneficial in contrast to less than 13 percent of teachers in other groups (p less than 0.001). The intensive feedback group received higher post-treatment videotape ratings than the videotape control group, both on ratings of specific categories of teacher behavior (p = 0.03) and on ratings of overall teaching performance (p = 0.08). More intensive feedback teachers (40 percent) than videotape control teachers (6 percent) improved their personally identified problem teaching behaviors (p less than 0.05). Trainee ratings showed no significant difference between study groups. It is concluded that attending physicians can improve their teaching performance. Intensive feedback is one possible method of achieving that goal.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6614032     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90351-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  24 in total

1.  A picture is worth a thousand words: practical use of videotape in teaching.

Authors:  L E Pinsky; J E Wipf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Teaching the teachers: national survey of faculty development in departments of medicine of U.S. teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Jeanne M Clark; Thomas K Houston; Ken Kolodner; William T Branch; Rachel B Levine; David E Kern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Outcomes of a national faculty development program in teaching skills: prospective follow-up of 110 medicine faculty development teams.

Authors:  Thomas K Houston; Jeanne M Clark; Rachel B Levine; Gary S Ferenchick; Judith L Bowen; William T Branch; Dennis W Boulware; Patrick Alguire; Richard H Esham; Charles P Clayton; David E Kern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The chromosomal analysis of teaching: the search for promoter genes.

Authors:  Kelley M Skeff
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2007

5.  Models of faculty development for problem-based learning.

Authors:  D M Irby
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.853

6.  Faculty development for ambulatory teaching.

Authors:  L Wilkerson; E Armstrong; L Lesky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Guidelines for promotion of clinician-educators. The Society of General Internal Medicine Education Committee.

Authors:  R M Lubitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Faculty development. A resource for clinical teachers.

Authors:  K M Skeff; G A Stratos; W Mygdal; T A DeWitt; L Manfred; M Quirk; K Roberts; L Greenberg; C J Bland
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Enhancing teaching effectiveness and vitality in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  K M Skeff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Supervisor evaluation : from theory to implementation.

Authors:  N Herrmann
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  1996-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.