Literature DB >> 6608274

Facial pattern differences in long-faced children and adults.

H W Fields, W R Proffit, W L Nixon, C Phillips, E Stanek.   

Abstract

Vertical facial morphology has traditionally been studied by examining subjects chosen because of open bite/overbite or mandibular plane angle. The underlying skeletal and dental morphology associated with clinical facial appearance of normal and vertically dysplastic children and adults has not been well documented. The purposes of this study were to (1) describe vertical facial morphology in long-, normal-, and short-faced children and long-faced and normal adults, and (2) identify morphologic factors associated with the clinical evaluation of long-faced and normal subjects. Forty-two children, 6 to 12 years old, and forty-two young adults with varied vertical facial types were examined clinically and separated into three vertical classifications: long, normal, or short face. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained in natural head position and seven angular, eighteen linear, and six ratio measurements were made. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize all groups, and intergroup differences were compared using analysis of variance for the three child groups and the t test for the two adult groups. For both long-faced children and adults, anterior total face height, mandibular plane angle, gonial angle, and mandibulopalatal plane angle were significantly greater than normal. Ramus height was not significantly different from normal in the children, but there was a tendency for long-faced adults to have short rami. Excessive dentoalveolar development was evident in long-faced children but not in adults. Factors associated with the clinical identification of vertical dysplastic subjects were identified by a principal component analysis. For each component, a variable highly correlated with that component was selected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6608274     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90061-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  19 in total

1.  An international comparison of early treatment of angle Class-II/1 cases. Skeletal effects of the first phase of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  U Ehmer; C J Tulloch; W R Proffit; C Phillips
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Morphology of open bite.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Krey; Karl-Heinz Dannhauer; Thomas Hierl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  [Positional and morphologic relations of the facial skeleton].

Authors:  M Arat; F Gürbüz; Z Bayazit; B Berksü
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1988-12

4.  Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Christian Reis Lemes; Carolina Fernandes Tozzi; Saulo Gribel; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Giovana Cherubini Venezian; Caroline do Carmo Menezes; William Custodio
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Orthopedic correction of growing hyperdivergent, retrognathic patients with miniscrew implants.

Authors:  Peter H Buschang; Roberto Carrillo; P Emile Rossouw
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Adult Anterior Open Bite Study: Treatment success.

Authors:  Lauren S Todoki; Samuel A Finkleman; Ellen Funkhouser; Geoffrey M Greenlee; Kelly W Choi; Hsiu-Ching Ko; Hsuan-Fang Wang; Peter A Shapiro; Roozbeh Khosravi; Camille Baltuck; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Calogero Dolce; Chung How Kau; Kyungsup Shin; Jaime de Jesus-Vinas; Michael Vermette; Cameron Jolley; Greg J Huang
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Association of Dysplastic Coronoid Process with Long-Face Morphology.

Authors:  T Chen; Z Liu; C Xue; W Tian; D Bai; Y P Chen
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Sukru Enhos; Tancan Uysal; Ahmet Yagci; İlknur Veli; Faruk Izzet Ucar; Törün Ozer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Influence of cone beam CT volume orientation on alveolar bone measurements in patients with different facial profiles.

Authors:  Eliana Dantas Costa; Priscila Dias Peyneau; Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Matheus Lima Oliveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  The inclination of mandibular incisors revisited.

Authors:  Cécile Gütermann; Timo Peltomäki; Goran Markic; Michael Hänggi; Marc Schätzle; Luca Signorelli; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.