Literature DB >> 23985035

The inclination of mandibular incisors revisited.

Cécile Gütermann1, Timo Peltomäki, Goran Markic, Michael Hänggi, Marc Schätzle, Luca Signorelli, Raphael Patcas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To reassess the inclination of lower incisors and evaluate possible associations with gender, age, symphyseal parameters, and skeletal pattern.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve hundred and seventy-two (605 females, 667 males) cephalograms of untreated subjects of a craniofacial growth study (age: 8-16 years) were evaluated. Correlations between the angulation of the lower incisors and age, symphyseal distances (height, width, and depth), symphyseal ratios (height-width, height-depth), and skeletal angles (divergence of the jaws and gonial angle) were investigated for all ages separately and for both sexes independently.
RESULTS: The inclination of lower incisors increased over age (8 years: girls = 93.9° [95% CI, 92.3°-95.7°], boys = 93.3° [95% CI, 91.8°-94.9°]; 16 years: girls = 96.1° [95% CI, 94.1°-98.2°], boys = 97.1° [95% CI, 95.6°-98.6°]). Inclination of lower incisors correlated with the divergence of the jaws for all ages significantly or highly significantly, except for boys and girls 9 years of age and girls 11 and 12 years of age, for which only a tendency was observed. Similarly, a strong correlation to gonial angle could be observed. No correlation could be found between the inclination of lower incisors and any symphyseal parameters (absolute measurements and ratios), except for symphyseal depth.
CONCLUSION: Lower incisor inclination is linked to the subject's sex, age, and skeletal pattern. It is not associated with symphyseal dimensions, except symphyseal depth. Factors related to natural inclination of lower incisors should be respected when establishing a treatment plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23985035      PMCID: PMC8683058          DOI: 10.2319/040413-262.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  31 in total

1.  THE ROTATION OF THE MANDIBLE RESULTING FROM GROWTH: ITS IMPLICATIONS IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT.

Authors:  F F SCHUDY
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Some periodontal tissue reactions to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys.

Authors:  J L Wennström; J Lindhe; F Sinclair; B Thilander
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 8.728

3.  Tissue changes resulting from facial tipping and extrusion of incisors in monkeys.

Authors:  K F Batenhorst; G M Bowers; J E Williams
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  A classification of skeletal facial types.

Authors:  V Sassouni
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1969-02

5.  Root resorption, marginal bone support and clinical crown length in orthodontically treated patients.

Authors:  L Hollender; A Rönnerman; B Thilander
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Skeletal morphologic features of anterior open bite.

Authors:  T J Cangialosi
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-01

7.  Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years.

Authors:  A Björk; V Skieller
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study.

Authors:  P P Siriwat; J R Jarabak
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth.

Authors:  T Aki; R S Nanda; G F Currier; S K Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Prediction of mandibular growth rotation evaluated from a longitudinal implant sample.

Authors:  V Skieller; A Björk; T Linde-Hansen
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  No association between gingival labial recession and facial type.

Authors:  Katerina Mazurova; Anne-Marie Renkema; Zuzana Navratilova; Christos Katsaros; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Age- and gender-related incisor changes in different vertical craniofacial relationships.

Authors:  Amal I Linjawi
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

3.  Mandibular symphysis morphology and lower incisor angulation in different anteroposterior jaw relationships and skeletal growth patterns - a cephalometric study.

Authors:  Sandhya Jain; Prateek Puniyani; Arwa Saifee
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2020-01-31

4.  Implications of pretreatment incisor inclinations for the achievement of cephalometric normal values-a study on two patient collectives.

Authors:  B Zimmer; H Sino; S Schenk-Kazan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Proposed parameters of optimal central incisor positioning in orthodontic treatment planning: A systematic review.

Authors:  Linda Sangalli; Domenico Dalessandri; Stefano Bonetti; Gualtiero Mandelli; Luca Visconti; Fabio Savoldi
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.