Literature DB >> 6602483

Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: sensitivity of double- and single-contrast studies.

C D Johnson, H C Carlson, W F Taylor, L P Weiland.   

Abstract

A total of 1,140 primary colorectal carcinomas found in 1084 patients during a 5 1/2-year period (1976 to mid-1981) at the Mayo Clinic was reviewed to evaluate the accuracy of detection by the double- and single-contrast barium enema examinations. Both methods were equally sensitive in detecting colon cancer above the proctoscopic level. The error rate (ulcerative colitis excluded) was 4.8% for the single-contrast enema and 4.7% for the double-contrast study. Neither type of examination was superior in finding smaller lesions or earlier staged lesions. Several causes for error were identified: fluoroscopic inexperience, technical factors, misinterpretation of radiologic findings, and distraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6602483     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.140.6.1143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R Scott Nelson; Alan G Thorson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Impact of the barium enema on patient management.

Authors:  Y M Chen; D J Ott; D W Gelfand; H A Munitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1988

3.  Limiting overhead views in double-contrast colon examinations does not affect diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  P J Feczko; R D Halpert
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1987

4.  Combined use of double- and single-contrast barium enema in the evaluation of suspected colonic disease.

Authors:  B E Demas; A R Margulis
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1984

5.  The evaluation of rectal bleeding in adults. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four diagnostic strategies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Allen; Christina Nicolaidis; Mark Helfand
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Colorectal carcinomas: diagnostic implications of their changing frequency and anatomic distribution.

Authors:  G G Ghahremani; K Dowlatshahi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Relative rates of missed diagnosis for colonoscopy, barium enema, and flexible sigmoidoscopy in 379 patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Catherine T Frenette; Williamson B Strum
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2008-09-13

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer. Can we lower the death rate in the 1990s?

Authors:  J J Donald; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Double contrast barium enema and colorectal carcinoma: sensitivity and potential role in screening.

Authors:  J S Gillespie; B E Kelly
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2001-05

10.  Korean guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection.

Authors:  Bo-In Lee; Sung Pil Hong; Seong-Eun Kim; Se Hyung Kim; Hyun-Soo Kim; Sung Noh Hong; Dong-Hoon Yang; Sung Jae Shin; Suck-Ho Lee; Dong Il Park; Young-Ho Kim; Hyun Jung Kim; Suk-Kyun Yang; Hyo Jong Kim; Hae Jeong Jeon
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2012-03-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.