Literature DB >> 3350273

Impact of the barium enema on patient management.

Y M Chen1, D J Ott, D W Gelfand, H A Munitz.   

Abstract

The medical records of 214 consecutive inpatients who had a barium enema examination were reviewed, and the clinical indications, efficacy of the barium enema, and patient outcome were correlated to determine the impact of the barium enema on patient management. The most frequent indications were rectal bleeding (33%), abdominal pain (31%), anemia (17%), weight loss (12%), and previous lesions needing reevaluation (12%). Diverticular disease (30%), colonic polyps (10%), and primary or secondary malignancies (12%) were the most common abnormalities detected radiographically. The sensitivity of the barium enema for colonic neoplasms was 89%, with only 1 small cecal polyp being undetected. The effects of barium enema on patient management were serious pathology excluded (64%), diagnosis made that changed therapy (24%), existing therapy continued (10%), and a further study ordered (2%). No serious or life-threatening lesion was missed by barium enema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3350273     DOI: 10.1007/BF01889029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  10 in total

1.  Colonoscopic evaluation of rectal bleeding: a study of 304 patients.

Authors:  F J Tedesco; J D Waye; J B Raskin; S J Morris; R A Greenwald
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Single-contrast vs double-contrast barium enema in the detection of colonic polyps.

Authors:  D J Ott; Y M Chen; D W Gelfand; W C Wu; H A Munitz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Lower gastrointestinal bleeding with negative or inconclusive radiographic studies: the role of colonoscopy.

Authors:  G J Todd; K A Forde
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The role of colonoscopic evaluation following partial colon resection for adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  P G Brady; B A Frank; L E Zeabart
Journal:  J Fla Med Assoc       Date:  1984-03

5.  Diagnostic sensitivity of X-ray examination of the large bowel in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Brekkan; O Kjartansson; H Tulinius; H Sigvaldason
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1983

6.  Colonoscopy and the barium enema: a radiologic viewpoint.

Authors:  D J Ott; D W Gelfand; Y M Chen; H A Munitz
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Sensitivity of single contrast barium enema with regard to colorectal disease as diagnosed by colonoscopy.

Authors:  J V Kaude; R F Harty
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: sensitivity of double- and single-contrast studies.

Authors:  C D Johnson; H C Carlson; W F Taylor; L P Weiland
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  The value of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium-enema examinations in the evaluation of patients with subacute and chronic lower intestinal bleeding.

Authors:  R F Thoeni; A C Venbrux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Postoperative screening of patients with carcinoma of the colon.

Authors:  R W Beart; P P Metzger; M J O'Connell; A J Schutt
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.585

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of barium meal examination: a prospective evaluation in general practice.

Authors:  B G Conry; A M McLean; M J Farthing
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-12-09

2.  Pediatric barium enema examination: optimizing patient selection with univariate and multivariate analyses.

Authors:  R Y Kanterman; M J Siegel; J E Rossiter
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1994
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.