Literature DB >> 19089670

Relative rates of missed diagnosis for colonoscopy, barium enema, and flexible sigmoidoscopy in 379 patients with colorectal cancer.

Catherine T Frenette1, Williamson B Strum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failures of diagnosis of colorectal cancer by colonoscopy, barium enema, and flexible sigmoidoscopy have been demonstrated using various techniques. A relative assessment of these diagnostic tests for patients with colorectal cancer has not been reported. This study was designed to determine relative rates of failures for these tests when applied to diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
METHODS: We created a database of patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2005. Records were reviewed for the results of colonoscopy, barium enema, and flexible sigmoidoscopy in the 3 years prior to diagnosis. An examination that was negative for cancer with no immediate follow-up was defined as a failure of diagnosis, either from inaccurate observation, failure to examine the entire colon, or failure of timely follow-up. The failure rates were compared.
RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-nine patients, who had 421 examinations, were analyzed. The diagnosis of colorectal cancer failed in 60 of 379 patients (16%). These 60 patients had 71 examinations that failed to make the diagnosis: 25 of 282 colonoscopies (9%), 16 of 79 barium enemas (20%), and 30 of 60 flexible sigmoidoscopies (50%). These differences were statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Failure rates for colonoscopy, barium enema, and flexible sigmoidoscopy were 9%, 20%, and 50%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19089670     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-008-9027-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  38 in total

1.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Inku Hwang; James A Butler; Michael L Puckett; Hans A Hildebrandt; Roy K Wong; Pamela A Nugent; Pauline A Mysliwiec; William R Schindler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Raquel E Davila; Elizabeth Rajan; Todd H Baron; Douglas G Adler; James V Egan; Douglas O Faigel; Seng-Ian Gan; William K Hirota; Jonathan A Leighton; David Lichtenstein; Waqar A Qureshi; Bo Shen; Marc J Zuckerman; Trina VanGuilder; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Impact of adenoma size in distal colon on risk for advanced adenoma of the proximal colon.

Authors:  Williamson B Strum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Brian Bressler; Lawrence F Paszat; Zhongliang Chen; Deanna M Rothwell; Chris Vinden; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Position changes improve visibility during colonoscope withdrawal: a randomized, blinded, crossover trial.

Authors:  James E East; Noriko Suzuki; Naila Arebi; Paul Bassett; Brian P Saunders
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Robert H Fletcher; Jonathon S Stillman; Michael J O'Brien; Bernard Levin; Robert A Smith; David A Lieberman; Randall W Burt; Theodore R Levin; John H Bond; Durado Brooks; Tim Byers; Neil Hyman; Lynne Kirk; Alan Thorson; Clifford Simmang; David Johnson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy.

Authors:  M Leaper; M J Johnston; M Barclay; B R Dobbs; F A Frizelle
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  The incidence of colorectal cancer following a negative screening sigmoidoscopy: implications for screening interval.

Authors:  V Paul Doria-Rose; Theodore R Levin; Joe V Selby; Polly A Newcomb; Kathryn E Richert-Boe; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  3 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of missed colorectal cancer cases and common pitfalls in diagnosis.

Authors:  P G Vaughan-Shaw; M Aung; H Knight; T Williams; N R Borley; J M D Wheeler
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28

2.  Diagnostic miss rate for colorectal cancer: an audit.

Authors:  Mary Than; Jolene Witherspoon; Javed Shami; Prachi Patil; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

3.  Cell-surface markers for colon adenoma and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kamini Sewda; Domenico Coppola; Steven Enkemann; Binglin Yue; Jongphil Kim; Alexis S Lopez; Jonathan W Wojtkowiak; Valerie E Stark; Brian Morse; David Shibata; Shivakumar Vignesh; David L Morse
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.