Early origin and pervasiveness of cellular heterogeneity in some malignant transformations.

Nontransformed BALB/3T3 cells were passaged weekly in monolayer culture on plastic dishes and aliquots were regularly assayed for colony production when suspended in agar. During several months of passaging, a single large colony arose once in the agar assay, and its constituent cells were isolated to form a subline of transformed cells. These cells had the fusiform and rounded morphologies characteristic of transformed cells and had a colony-forming efficiency in agar (CFEag) of approximately 10%. Five of the agar colonies were isolated at random and the cell populations of these primary subclones were further analyzed. Four of the five subclonal populations differed from each other in appearance slightly, but consistently, while the fifth had a markedly different colonial morphology. They also differed from one another in CFEag as well as in average diameter of the agar colonies. These general differences among the five subclones remained, although the CFEag and colony sizes changed recognizably in repeated weekly transfers. All of the subclones produced sarcomas in nude mice but did so at different rates. A secondary generation of five subclones was derived from each of three of the original subclonal populations. All the secondary subclones had the same morphology as the primary subclones from which they were derived. The averages of the CFEag and colony sizes of the secondary subclones from each of the subclones differed as a group from the other groups, but they also differed, to a lesser extent, among themselves. Despite the differences noted among the primary subclones in morphology, growth in agar, and tumor production in mice, they were virtually identical in their rapid growth rate on a plastic surface and all shared a high rate of glucose consumption. A second transformed clone arose among the continuously passaged nontransformed cells 5 months after the first one had appeared. Subclones of this clone did not differ recognizably from one another in morphology or in CFEag. The results indicate that recognizable heterogeneity can arise in some tumors during the earliest stages of their development and involve a high proportion of their constituent cells, while it may not become evident in other tumors until much later.