Literature DB >> 6581755

Imipenem versus moxalactam in the treatment of serious infections.

L J Eron, D L Hixon, C H Park, R I Goldenberg, D M Poretz.   

Abstract

Imipenem (formerly imipemide, N-formimidoyl thienamycin, or MK0787) was compared to moxalactam in a randomized therapeutic trial involving 39 evaluable patients with serious bacterial infections. Of those treated with imipenem, 89% were cured or improved versus 60% for moxalactam (P = 0.06). Although mucocutaneous fungal infections occurred in both groups (25 and 10%, respectively), Streptococcus faecalis superinfection was seen in two patients in the moxalactam group only. Adverse drug reactions occurred with both drugs, although bleeding occurred in three patients treated with moxalactam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6581755      PMCID: PMC185393          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.24.6.841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  11 in total

1.  Prolonged bleeding times and bleeding diathesis associated with moxalactam administration.

Authors:  M R Weitekamp; R C Aber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Enterococcal superinfection and colonization after therapy with moxalactam, a new broad-spectrum antibiotic.

Authors:  V L Yu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Urinary recovery of N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) as affected by coadministration of N-formimidoyl thienamycin dehydropeptidase inhibitors.

Authors:  S R Norrby; K Alestig; B Björnegård; L A Burman; F Ferber; J L Huber; K H Jones; F M Kahan; J S Kahan; H Kropp; M A Meisinger; J G Sundelof
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative in vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin against gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic species and its beta-lactamase stability.

Authors:  H C Neu; P Labthavikul
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States in 1981.

Authors:  F P Tally; G J Cuchural; N V Jacobus; S L Gorbach; K E Aldridge; T J Cleary; S M Finegold; G B Hill; P B Iannini; R V McCloskey; J P O'Keefe; C L Pierson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Ceftazidime therapy of serious bacterial infections.

Authors:  L J Eron; R I Goldenberg; C H Park; D M Poretz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Clinical evaluation of moxalactam.

Authors:  G E Mathisen; R D Meyer; J M Thompson; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Clinical experience with Moxalactam in the treatment of pseudomonal and nonpseudomonal infections.

Authors:  T F Murphy; M Barza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Influence of inoculum size on activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam, piperacillin, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  M L Corrado; S H Landesman; C E Cherubin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Moxalactam therapy of infections caused by cephalothin-resistant bacteria: influence of serum inhibitory activity on clinical response and acquisition of antibiotic resistance during therapy.

Authors:  R Platt; S L Ehrlich; J Afarian; T F O'Brien; J E Pennington; E H Kass
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  12 in total

1.  Imipenem: a new carbapenem. Committee on Antimicrobial Agents, Canadian Infectious Disease Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  In vitro effect of cefodizime, imipenem/cilastatin and co-trimoxazole on dexamethasone and cyclosporin A depressed phagocytosis.

Authors:  A Dhondt; R Vanholder; M A Waterloos; G Glorieux; R De Smet; S Ringoir
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Imipenem/cilastatin.

Authors:  M Barza
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  A multiclinic randomized study of the comparative efficacy, safety and tolerance of imipenem/cilastatin and moxalactam.

Authors:  G B Calandra; M Hesney; C Grad
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Imipenem/cilastatin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  S P Clissold; P A Todd; D M Campoli-Richards
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Imipenem (N-F-thienamycin) versus netilmicin plus clindamycin. A controlled and randomized comparison in intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  H R Gonzenbach; H P Simmen; R Amgwerd
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Cilastatin does not alter superoxide dismutase activity.

Authors:  R A Proctor; J A Textor
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Safety and efficacy of high-dose treatment with imipenem-cilastatin in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  B A Zajac; M A Fisher; G A Gibson; R R MacGregor
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  W Fan; R del Busto; M Love; N Markowitz; C Cendrowski; J Cardenas; E Quinn; L Saravolatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Biliary excretion of imipenem-cilastatin in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  A L Graziani; G A Gibson; R R MacGregor
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.