Literature DB >> 656007

Some influences of touch and pressure cues on human spatial orientation.

J R Lackner, A Graybiel.   

Abstract

During constant velocity rotation about his recumbent Z axis, a blindfolded subject feels as if he were on an orbital path in the same direction. This experienced motion results from the pattern of touch and pressure stimulation of the body surface. If the subject changes the pressure pattern on his body by bracing himself in the rotating apparatus in different ways, it is possible for him to influence profoundly and systematically his apparent orientation. For example, pressure on the top of his head while he is rotating can make the subject feel he is upside down on a cylindrical path. The changes in apparent ongoing posture elicited by different patterns of pressure cues are very similar for different subjects and are constant for the same subject over time. During experienced orbital motion, a subject will hear a continuously emitting sound source--one that is stationary in the external environment--as circling his head in the direction opposite that of his true rotation. If the rotating subject is permitted unrestricted sight of his surroundings, he neither experiences orbital motion nor mislocalizes sounds. These observations provide insight into the spatial orientation mechanisms that normally allow an organism to distinguish accurately between those changes in activity at its receptors contingent on its own movements, and those resulting from movement within the environment. They also provide a way of understanding some of the postural illusions experienced during exposure to unusual force environments, including free fall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 656007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  10 in total

1.  Mechanisms of human static spatial orientation.

Authors:  S B Bortolami; S Rocca; S Daros; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Eye and neck proprioceptive messages contribute to the spatial coding of retinal input in visually oriented activities.

Authors:  R Roll; J L Velay; J P Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Constructive perception of self-motion.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Gin McCollum
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Correlations between posturographic findings and symptoms in subjects with fractures of the condylar head of the mandible.

Authors:  Mario M Faralli; Claudio C Calenti; Maria Cristina M Ibba; Gianpietro G Ricci; Antonio A Frenguelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Motion perceptions induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt.

Authors:  P Denise; C Darlot; J Droulez; B Cohen; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Fingertip contact influences human postural control.

Authors:  J J Jeka; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Combined effects of noise, vibration and visual field stimulation on electrical brain activity and optomotor responses.

Authors:  I Pyykkö; J Starck
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Phase-linking and the perceived motion during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Scott J Wood; Gin McCollum
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 9.  A vestibular sensation: probabilistic approaches to spatial perception.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Eliana M Klier; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Causal Inference in the Perception of Verticality.

Authors:  Ksander N de Winkel; Mikhail Katliar; Daniel Diers; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.