Literature DB >> 6547051

Radiation sensitization and chemopotentiation: RSU 1069, a compound more efficient than misonidazole in vitro and in vivo.

G E Adams, I Ahmed, P W Sheldon, I J Stratford.   

Abstract

Electron affinity as measured by the one-electron reduction potential, E17, is the major factor influencing radiosensitizing efficiency in vitro. RSU 1069 has an electron affinity (E17 = -398 mV) similar to misonidazole; however, the ability of this compound to sensitize hypoxic cells is considerably greater than that of misonidazole, e.g. 0.2 mM RSU 1069 gives an enhancement ratio of 2.2 compared to 1.5 for the same concentration of misonidazole. Radiosensitization studies with the MT tumour in vivo also showed RSU 1069 to be a more efficient sensitizer than misonidazole. An administered dose of only 0.08 mg g-1 RSU 1069 yielded an enhancement of 1.8 to 1.9 using tumour cell survival and tumour cure as end-points. The ability of RSU 1069 to potentiate the cytotoxic action of melphalan towards the MT tumour was also examined. RSU 1069 (0.08 mg g-1) given to mice 1 h before melphalan resulted in an enhancement of 3.0. In contrast, previous studies had shown with a series of nitroimidazoles including misonidazole that Ro 03-8799 was the most effective potentiating agent, but this only gave an enhancement of 2.3 at a 10-fold higher dose than RSU 1069. RSU 1069 is a compound of substantial promise both as a radiosensitizer and chemopotentiating agent and warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6547051      PMCID: PMC1976714          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1984.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  33 in total

1.  Protection against the effects of the antitumour agent CB 1954 by certain imidazoles and related compounds.

Authors:  J A Hickman; D H Melzack
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1975-11-01       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Radiosensitization by misonidazole (Ro 07-0582). The importance of timing and tumor concentration of sensitizer.

Authors:  N J McNally; J Denekamp; P Sheldon; I R Flockhart; F A Stewart
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Studies on the reversal of the selective antitumour effect of the aziridinyl derivative CB 1954 by 4-amino-5-imidazolecarboxamide.

Authors:  T A Connors; H G Mandel; D H Melzack
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1972-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Studies in the nitroimidazole series. 3. 2-Nitroimidazole derivatives substituted in the 1-position.

Authors:  A G Beaman; W Tautz; R Duschinsky
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda)       Date:  1967

5.  Electron-affinic sensitization. VII. A correlation between structures, one-electron reduction potentials, and efficiencies of nitroimidazoles as hypoxic cell radiosensitizers.

Authors:  G E Adams; I R Flockhart; C E Smithen; I J Stratford; P Wardman; M E Watts
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Further investigations of the effects of the hypoxic-cell radiosensitizer, Ro-07-0582, on local control of a mouse tumour.

Authors:  P W Sheldon; S A Hill
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Hypoxic cell radiosensitizers and local control by X-ray of a transplanted tumour in mice.

Authors:  P W Sheldon; S A Hill
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Studies on the mechanism of action of 5-aziridinyl-2,4-dinitrobenzamide (CB 1954), a selective inhibitor of the Walker tumour.

Authors:  T A Connors; D H Melzack
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1971-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Structure-activity relationships in the development of hypoxic cell radiosensitizers. I. Sensitization efficiency.

Authors:  G E Adams; E D Clarke; I R Flockhart; R S Jacobs; D S Sehmi; I J Stratford; P Wardman; M E Watts; J Parrick; R G Wallace; C E Smithen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1979-02

10.  The radiosensitizer Ro 03-8799 and the concentrations which may be achieved in human tumours: a preliminary study.

Authors:  M I Saunders; S Dische; D Fermont; A Bishop; I Lenox-Smith; J G Allen; S L Malcolm
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Redox properties and rate constants in free-radical mediated damage.

Authors:  P Wardman; E D Clarke
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1987-06

2.  Fluosol-DA/carbogen with lonidamine or pentoxifylline as modulators of alkylating agents in the FSaIIC fibrosarcoma.

Authors:  B A Teicher; T S Herman; J Tanaka; B Dezube; A Pardee; E Frei
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of the mixed-function hypoxic cell sensitizer prototype RSU 1069 in mice.

Authors:  M I Walton; P Workman
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  CB 1954 revisited. II. Toxicity and antitumour activity.

Authors:  P Workman; J E Morgan; K Talbot; K A Wright; J Donaldson; P R Twentyman
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  CB 1954 revisited. I. Disposition kinetics and metabolism.

Authors:  P Workman; R A White; K Talbot
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Hypoxia and drug resistance.

Authors:  B A Teicher
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 7.  The clinical importance of assessing tumor hypoxia: relationship of tumor hypoxia to prognosis and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Joseph C Walsh; Artem Lebedev; Edward Aten; Kathleen Madsen; Liane Marciano; Hartmuth C Kolb
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 8.  Assessing the bioreductive effectiveness of the nitroimidazole RSU1069 and its prodrug RB6145: with particular reference to in vivo methods of evaluation.

Authors:  J C Bremner
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.264

9.  Pharmacokinetic contribution to the improved therapeutic selectivity of a novel bromoethylamino prodrug (RB 6145) of the mixed-function hypoxic cell sensitizer/cytotoxin alpha-(1-aziridinomethyl)-2-nitro-1H-imidazole-1-ethanol (RSU 1069).

Authors:  M Binger; P Workman
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  High uptake of RSU 1069 and its analogues melanotic melanomas.

Authors:  J M Walling; J Deacon; S Holliday; I J Stratford
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.