Literature DB >> 6535983

Acuity of sound localisation: a topography of auditory space. I. Normal hearing conditions.

S R Oldfield, S P Parker.   

Abstract

Eight subjects were required to localise a sound source (white noise through a speaker) which varied in position on both sides of the head over a range of elevations (-40 degrees to +40 degrees) and azimuths (0 degree to 180 degrees) at 10 degrees intervals. The perceived position of the source was indicated by pointing a special gun. Depression of the trigger activated a photographic system which recorded two views of the subject, the sound source, and the gun. The absolute and algebraic, azimuth and elevation errors were measured for all subjects at each position of the source. The variability of azimuth and elevation error was also computed. In a second experiment, four of the same subjects performed the same task but in this case visually located the sources. This experiment provided an estimate of inherent motor error in the pointing task. No differences in localisation acuity between sides were found, but there were significant differences between front and back regions. Azimuth and elevation error were well matched and low in the front. However, azimuth error increased in the regions behind the head, particularly for azimuth positions 120 degrees to 160 degrees. Larger increases were found for positions in the upper elevations of this region. Elevation error also increased in the upper elevations behind the head. A comparison of the auditory and visual data indicates that this pattern of error is not due to motor factors. The results are discussed in relation to the structural characteristics of the pinnae and modifications that they impose on incoming sound energy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6535983     DOI: 10.1068/p130581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  33 in total

1.  Temporal grouping in auditory spatial serial memory.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Murray T Maybery; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

2.  Relearning sound localization with a new ear.

Authors:  Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Spatial coding in two dimensions.

Authors:  Sandro Rubichi; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Roberto Nicoletti; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

4.  Can measures of sound localization acuity be related to the precision of absolute location estimates?

Authors:  Jordan M Moore; Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Gaze shifts to auditory and visual stimuli in cats.

Authors:  Janet L Ruhland; Tom C T Yin; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-08

6.  Misperception of exocentric directions in auditory space.

Authors:  Joeanna C Arthur; John W Philbeck; Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-13

7.  Influence of aging on human sound localization.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones?

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltà; E P Tressoldi; C A Marzi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-03

9.  Where did that noise come from? Memory for sound locations is exceedingly eccentric both in front and in rear space.

Authors:  Franco Delogu; Phillip McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-06-13

10.  Sound localization behavior in ferrets: comparison of acoustic orientation and approach-to-target responses.

Authors:  F R Nodal; V M Bajo; C H Parsons; J W Schnupp; A J King
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.