Literature DB >> 6530932

Estimating patient dielectric losses in NMR imagers.

T W Redpath, J M Hutchison.   

Abstract

Dielectric losses in the patient may impair radiofrequency receiver coil sensitivity, and transmitter coil efficiency, in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imagers. The frequency dependence of this loss mechanism is derived. Patient losses in a solenoidal head coil used for imaging heads were simulated by a cylindrical saline phantom. The frequency dependence of the loss introduced by the phantom can indicate whether dielectric losses in the patient will be significant compared to eddy current losses. The detuning caused by the phantom is used to calculate an upper limit for the distributed stray capacitance between coil and patient. Given the approximate conductivity of the patient, an upper limit for the dielectric loss can be estimated. Some methods of reducing patient dielectric losses are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6530932     DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(84)90195-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  6 in total

1.  Stripline resonator and preamplifier for preclinical magnetic resonance imaging at 4.7 T.

Authors:  Ioannis Lavdas; Hugh C Seton; Charles R Harrington; Claude M Wischik
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Advanced theory of driven birdcage resonator with losses for biomedical magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Novikov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Triarylmethyl Radical: EPR Signal to Noise at Frequencies between 250 MHz and 1.5 GHz and Dependence of Relaxation on Radical and Salt Concentration and on Frequency.

Authors:  Yilin Shi; Richard W Quine; George A Rinard; Laura Buchanan; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton; Boris Epel; Simone Wanless Seagle; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Z Phys Chem (N F)       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  A feasibility study of altered spatial distribution of losses induced by eddy currents in body composition analysis.

Authors:  Kim H Blomqvist; Raimo E Sepponen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Low-field MRI can be more sensitive than high-field MRI.

Authors:  Aaron M Coffey; Milton L Truong; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 6.  In vivo methods and applications of xenon-129 magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Helen Marshall; Neil J Stewart; Ho-Fung Chan; Madhwesha Rao; Graham Norquay; Jim M Wild
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 9.795

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.