Literature DB >> 24239701

Low-field MRI can be more sensitive than high-field MRI.

Aaron M Coffey1, Milton L Truong2, Eduard Y Chekmenev3.   

Abstract

MRI signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is the key factor for image quality. Conventionally, SNR is proportional to nuclear spin polarization, which scales linearly with magnetic field strength. Yet ever-stronger magnets present numerous technical and financial limitations. Low-field MRI can mitigate these constraints with equivalent SNR from non-equilibrium 'hyperpolarization' schemes, which increase polarization by orders of magnitude independently of the magnetic field. Here, theory and experimental validation demonstrate that combination of field independent polarization (e.g. hyperpolarization) with frequency optimized MRI detection coils (i.e. multi-turn coils using the maximum allowed conductor length) results in low-field MRI sensitivity approaching and even rivaling that of high-field MRI. Four read-out frequencies were tested using samples with identical numbers of (1)H and (13)C spins. Experimental SNRs at 0.0475T were ∼40% of those obtained at 4.7T. Conservatively, theoretical SNRs at 0.0475T 1.13-fold higher than those at 4.7T were possible despite an ∼100-fold lower detection frequency, indicating feasibility of high-sensitivity MRI without technically challenging, expensive high-field magnets. The data at 4.7T and 0.0475T was obtained from different spectrometers with different RF probes. The SNR comparison between the two field strengths accounted for many differences in parameters such as system noise figures and variations in the probe detection coils including Q factors and coil diameters.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  13C; Hyperpolarization; Litz wire; Low-field MRI; MRI; NMR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24239701      PMCID: PMC3897717          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  16 in total

1.  Real-time metabolic imaging.

Authors:  Klaes Golman; René in 't Zandt; Mikkel Thaning
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cryogenic receive coil and low noise preamplifier for MRI at 0.01T.

Authors:  Frank Resmer; Hugh C Seton; James M S Hutchison
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  An optimized solenoidal head radiofrequency coil for low-field magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Barbara Blasiak; Vyacheslav Volotovskyy; Charlie Deng; Boguslaw Tomanek
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Analysis of cancer metabolism by imaging hyperpolarized nuclei: prospects for translation to clinical research.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron; Kevin Brindle; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Arnaud Comment; Charles H Cunningham; Ralph J Deberardinis; Gary G Green; Martin O Leach; Sunder S Rajan; Rahim R Rizi; Brian D Ross; Warren S Warren; Craig R Malloy
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  A large volume double channel 1H-X RF probe for hyperpolarized magnetic resonance at 0.0475 T.

Authors:  Aaron M Coffey; Roman V Shchepin; Ken Wilkens; Kevin W Waddell; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  SQUIDs vs. Induction Coils for Ultra-Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: Experimental and Simulation Comparison.

Authors:  Andrei N Matlashov; Larry J Schultz; Michelle A Espy; Robert H Kraus; Igor M Savukov; Petr L Volegov; Caroline J Wurden
Journal:  IEEE Trans Appl Supercond       Date:  2011

7.  Localized in vivo hyperpolarization transfer sequences.

Authors:  Mor Mishkovsky; Tian Cheng; Arnaud Comment; Rolf Gruetter
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Hyperpolarized 129Xe lung MRI in spontaneously breathing mice with respiratory gated fast imaging and its application to pulmonary functional imaging.

Authors:  Hirohiko Imai; Atsuomi Kimura; Yuki Hori; Satoshi Iguchi; Takuya Kitao; Emi Okubo; Tsuyoshi Ito; Toshio Matsuzaki; Hideaki Fujiwara
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  2012 ISMRM Lauterbur Lecture. MRI: from science to society.

Authors:  Vivian S Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Hyperpolarized (1)H NMR employing low gamma nucleus for spin polarization storage.

Authors:  Eduard Y Chekmenev; Valerie A Norton; Daniel P Weitekamp; Pratip Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  30 in total

1.  In situ and ex situ low-field NMR spectroscopy and MRI endowed by SABRE hyperpolarization.

Authors:  Danila A Barskiy; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Ping He; Kirsten A Groome; Quinn A Best; Fan Shi; Boyd M Goodson; Roman V Shchepin; Milton L Truong; Aaron M Coffey; Kevin W Waddell; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.102

2.  Toward hyperpolarized molecular imaging of HIV: synthesis and longitudinal relaxation properties of (15) N-Azidothymidine.

Authors:  Roman V Shchepin; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  J Labelled Comp Radiopharm       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 1.921

3.  Spin-Lattice Relaxation of Hyperpolarized Metronidazole in Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange in Micro-Tesla Fields.

Authors:  Roman V Shchepin; Lamya Jaigirdar; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.126

4.  NMR Spin-Lock Induced Crossing (SLIC) dispersion and long-lived spin states of gaseous propane at low magnetic field (0.05T).

Authors:  Danila A Barskiy; Oleg G Salnikov; Alexey S Romanov; Matthew A Feldman; Aaron M Coffey; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  A 3D-printed high power nuclear spin polarizer.

Authors:  Panayiotis Nikolaou; Aaron M Coffey; Laura L Walkup; Brogan M Gust; Cristen D LaPierre; Edward Koehnemann; Michael J Barlow; Matthew S Rosen; Boyd M Goodson; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Long-lived spin States for low-field hyperpolarized gas MRI.

Authors:  Kirill V Kovtunov; Milton L Truong; Danila A Barskiy; Igor V Koptyug; Aaron M Coffey; Kevin W Waddell; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.236

7.  Direct Hyperpolarization of Nitrogen-15 in Aqueous Media with Parahydrogen in Reversible Exchange.

Authors:  Johannes F P Colell; Meike Emondts; Angus W J Logan; Kun Shen; Junu Bae; Roman V Shchepin; Gerardo X Ortiz; Peter Spannring; Qiu Wang; Steven J Malcolmson; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Martin C Feiters; Floris P J T Rutjes; Bernhard Blümich; Thomas Theis; Warren S Warren
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Quasi-Resonance Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange.

Authors:  Thomas Theis; Nuwandi M Ariyasingha; Roman V Shchepin; Jacob R Lindale; Warren S Warren; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 6.475

Review 9.  MR Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Adrienne N Dula; C Chad Quarles; Ashley M Stokes; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor Zhukov; Jason M Williams; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  High-resolution 3D proton MRI of hyperpolarized gas enabled by parahydrogen and Rh/TiO2 heterogeneous catalyst.

Authors:  Kirill V Kovtunov; Danila A Barskiy; Aaron M Coffey; Milton L Truong; Oleg G Salnikov; Alexander K Khudorozhkov; Elizaveta A Inozemtseva; Igor P Prosvirin; Valery I Bukhtiyarov; Kevin W Waddell; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor V Koptyug
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 5.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.