Literature DB >> 6523040

Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem responses.

M Don, C Elberling, M Waring.   

Abstract

Detection of an auditory brainstem response, ABR, usually relies on visual evaluation of two or more data acquisition runs of a fixed number of sweeps to determine if there is sufficient replication of the averaged waveforms to indicate a response. Visual interpretation can be difficult when the signal-to-noise ratio is poor because of either a small response or high levels of physiological background noise. Moreover, variations in the background noise from run to run can result in poor or spurious replications of component peaks and troughs in the waveform. A previous study (Elberling & Don, 1984) described a statistical approach for objective evaluation of the quality of an ABR recording. The method uses variance analysis in calculating the ratio of the magnitude of the ABR to the estimated averaged background noise. This study further applies this method to obtain a quantitative definition of the ABR threshold, to demonstrate its application in automatic threshold detection, and to estimate the number of sweeps required to reach detection criterion. Application of this method is valuable in reducing the variability of test interpretation and in maximizing the efficiency of recording ABRs by avoiding the averaging of excessive or insufficient numbers of sweeps. These improvements enhance the cost-benefit of ABR testing to the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6523040     DOI: 10.3109/01050398409042130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol        ISSN: 0105-0397


  13 in total

1.  Flexible PC-based workstation for auditory evoked potential and psychoacoustic experiments.

Authors:  W T Cumming; J G Wells
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Estimating loudness growth from tone-burst evoked responses.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Measurement of signal and noise characteristics in ongoing auditory brainstem response averaging.

Authors:  O Ozdamar; R E Delgado
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Conducting shorter VEP tests to estimate visual acuity via assessment of SNR.

Authors:  Kartik K Iyer; Andrew P Bradley; Stephen J Wilson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: increasing efficiency.

Authors:  Brett A Martin; Arthur Boothroyd; Dassan Ali; Tiffany Leach-Berth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Geneviève Laumen; Alexander T Ferber; Georg M Klump; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  A simple algorithm for objective threshold determination of auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kirupa Suthakar; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Ear asymmetries in middle-ear, cochlear, and brainstem responses in human infants.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Michael P Gorga; Walt Jesteadt; Lynette M Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Objective threshold estimation and measurement of the residual background noise in auditory evoked potentials of goldfish.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xiao; Christopher B Braun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Non-stimulus-evoked activity as a measure of neural noise in the frequency-following response.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Silvia Bonacina; Rembrandt Otto-Meyer; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.987

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.