Literature DB >> 6512482

The quality of notification of congenital malformations.

E G Knox, E H Armstrong, R Lancashire.   

Abstract

The United Kingdom Congenital Malformations Notification Scheme began in 1964. It is based on notes added to birth notification forms. In Birmingham, a local scheme based on multiple sources has been run in parallel for the last 20 years. The national notification scheme records malformations noted up to the age of 7 days, whereas the Birmingham scheme collects information up to the age of 5 years. A case by case record linkage of the two registers was carried out. This operation revealed the essential completeness of the multiple-source register but gross defects among notifications. The extent and nature of the deficiencies are described. They include defects of ascertainment of malformed infants and of major additional malformations in those infants who are in fact notified, overnotification of infants without significant malformations, and misclassification of the major malformations that were, in fact, notified. The defects arise partly from the defective design of the national scheme and partly from defective implementation and a lack of designated supervisory responsibilities. The main requirements for a scheme that could indeed be relied upon to meet its monitoring objectives are set out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6512482      PMCID: PMC1052372          DOI: 10.1136/jech.38.4.296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  11 in total

1.  Surveillance of malformations at birth: a comparison of two record systems run in parallel.

Authors:  A Ericson; B Källén; J Winberg
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Pooled records from multiple sources for monitoring congenital anomalies.

Authors:  H B Newcombe
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1969-11

3.  The Finnish register of congenital malformations.

Authors:  L Saxén; A Klemetti
Journal:  Acta Univ Carol Med Monogr       Date:  1973

4.  A Swedish register of congenital malformations. Experience with continuous registration during 2 years with special reference to multiple malformations.

Authors:  B Källén; J Winberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  The incidence of malformations in Birmingham, England, 1950-1959.

Authors:  I Leck; R G Record; T McKeown; J H Edwards
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1968-08

6.  Congenital anomaly monitoring in New Zealand, 1979-81.

Authors:  F H Foster
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1982-11-10

7.  Evaluation of a neonatal discharge record as a monitor of congenital malformations.

Authors:  S K Cole
Journal:  Community Med       Date:  1983-02

8.  Congenital malformations register in Western Australia.

Authors:  J F Seward; F J Stanley
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1981-03-07       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Western Australian Congenital Malformations Register.

Authors:  C Bower; F J Stanley
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1983-08-20       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Congenital malformations surveillance: two American systems.

Authors:  L D Edmonds; P M Layde; L M James; J W Flynt; J D Erickson; G P Oakley
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  18 in total

1.  Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System.

Authors:  R B Lowry; N Y Thunem; S Anderson-Redick
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The value of England and Wales congenital malformation notification scheme data for epidemiology: male genital tract malformations.

Authors:  A J Swerdlow; D Melzer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Congenital anterior abdominal wall defects in England and Wales 1987-93: retrospective analysis of OPCS data.

Authors:  K H Tan; M D Kilby; M J Whittle; B R Beattie; I W Booth; B J Botting
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-12

4.  Evaluation of the hospital discharge diagnoses index and the birth certificate as sources of information on birth defects.

Authors:  A C Hexter; J A Harris; P Roeper; L A Croen; P Krueger; D Gant
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Effectiveness of screening for congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  E G Knox; E H Armstrong; R J Lancashire
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Clusters of anophthalmia.

Authors:  I Leck
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-19

7.  Inaccurate coding corrupts medical information.

Authors:  R Sunderland
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Births in Great Britain resulting from assisted conception, 1978-87. MRC Working Party on Children Conceived by In Vitro Fertilisation.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-05-12

9.  Congenital malformations in Assam.

Authors:  Hemonta Kr Dutta; N C Bhattacharyya; J N Sarma; Kusre Giriraj
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-04

10.  Ascertainment of congenital malformations: a comparative study of two systems.

Authors:  S J Dutton; J R Owens; F Harris
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.