Literature DB >> 2819634

Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System.

R B Lowry1, N Y Thunem, S Anderson-Redick.   

Abstract

The Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System was started in 1966 in response to the thalidomide tragedy earlier in the decade. It was one of four provincial surveillance systems on which the federal government relied for baseline statistics of congenital anomalies. The government now collects data from six provinces and one territory. The Alberta Congenital Anomaly Surveillance System originally depended on three types of notification to the Division of Vital Statistics, Department of Health, Government of Alberta: birth notice and certificates of death and stillbirth; increased sources of ascertainment have greatly improved data quality. We present the data for 1980-86 and compare the prevalence rates of selected anomalies with the rates from three other surveillance systems. Surveillance systems do not guarantee that a new teratogen will be detected, but they are extremely valuable for testing hypotheses regarding causation. At the very least they provide baseline data with which to compare any deviation or trend. For many, if not most, congenital anomalies total prevention is not possible; however, surveillance systems can be used to measure progress in prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2819634      PMCID: PMC1451275     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  15 in total

1.  Surveillance of malformations at birth: a comparison of two record systems run in parallel.

Authors:  A Ericson; B Källén; J Winberg
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Birth prevalence of cleft lip and palate in British Columbia between 1952 and 1986: stability of rates.

Authors:  R B Lowry; N Y Thunem; S H Uh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Measuring birth defects and handicapping disorders in the population: the British Columbia Health Surveillance Registry.

Authors:  P A Baird
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Maternal valproic acid and congenital neural tube defects.

Authors:  E Robert; P Guibaud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-10-23       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Western Australian Congenital Malformations Register.

Authors:  C Bower; F J Stanley
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1983-08-20       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Congenital anomalies in American Indians of British Columbia.

Authors:  R B Lowry; N Y Thunem; M Silver
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Congenital anomalies in the Hutterite population: a preliminary survey and hypothesis.

Authors:  R B Lowry; K Morgan; T M Holmes; S W Gilroy
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1985-11

8.  Birth prevalence and recurrence rates of neural tube defects in southern Alberta in 1970-81.

Authors:  N Y Thunem; R B Lowry; B J Tucker; B W Medd
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Congenital dislocation of the hip in Western Australia. A comparison of neonatally and postneonatally diagnosed cases.

Authors:  C Bower; F J Stanley; A Kricker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The quality of notification of congenital malformations.

Authors:  E G Knox; E H Armstrong; R Lancashire
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  10 in total

1.  Birth defects surveillance in China.

Authors:  Li Dai; Jun Zhu; Juan Liang; Yan-Ping Wang; He Wang; Meng Mao
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.764

2.  Status Report--Retracing the history of the early development of national chronic disease surveillance in Canada and the major role of the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control (LCDC) from 1972 to 2000.

Authors:  B C K Choi; D T Wigle; H Johansen; J Losos; M E Fair; E Napke; L J Anderson; J W Davies; K White; A B Miller; F C K Li; S Stachenko; J Lindsay; L A Gaudette; C Nair; I Levy; H Morrison; J Silins; F Bouchard; L Tonmyr; P J Villeneuve; L McRae; K C Johnson; R S Lane; A Probert
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Congenital dislocation of the hip in Canadian Indian populations.

Authors:  C S Houston
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Quality control of birth defect registry data: a case study.

Authors:  J Schulman; J A Hahn
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Reproductive and developmental hazards and employment policies.

Authors:  J D Johnston; G G Jamieson; S Wright
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-02

6.  Temporal trends in ankyloglossia and frenotomy in British Columbia, Canada, 2004-2013: a population-based study.

Authors:  K S Joseph; Brooke Kinniburgh; Amy Metcalfe; Neda Razaz; Yasser Sabr; Sarka Lisonkova
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-01-26

7.  The survey of birth defects rate based on birth registration system.

Authors:  Min Yu; Zhiguang Ping; Shuiping Zhang; Yuying He; Rui Dong; Xiong Guo
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Data Quality Assessment on Congenital Anomalies in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Qun Miao; Aideen M Moore; Shelley D Dougan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 9.  The epidemiology and demographics of hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Randall T Loder; Elaine N Skopelja
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2011-10-10

10.  Epidemiology of birth defects based on surveillance data from 2011-2015 in Guangxi, China: comparison across five major ethnic groups.

Authors:  Jichang Chen; Xuemei Huang; Bo Wang; Yu Zhang; Chokechai Rongkavilit; Dingyuan Zeng; Yongjiang Jiang; Ba Wei; Chawla Sanjay; Eric McGrath
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.295

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.