Literature DB >> 2354290

Births in Great Britain resulting from assisted conception, 1978-87. MRC Working Party on Children Conceived by In Vitro Fertilisation.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics at birth of children conceived by in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or by gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) and to assess whether they differ from those of children conceived naturally.
DESIGN: Survey of children resulting from IVF or GIFT and comparison of their characteristics at birth with national statistics.
SETTING: England, Scotland, and Wales from 1978 to 1987.
SUBJECTS: 1267 Pregnancies conceived by IVF or GIFT, which resulted in 1581 liveborn or stillborn children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sex ratio, multiplicity, gestational age at birth, birth weight, stillbirth rate, perinatal and infant mortality, and prevalence of congenital malformations.
RESULTS: The ratio of male to female births was 1.07:1; 23% (249/1092) of the deliveries were multiple births compared with 1% for natural conceptions; 24% (278) of 1015 deliveries were preterm compared with 6% in England and Wales; 32% (406) of 1269 babies weighed less than 2500 g compared with 7% in England and Wales. The high percentage of preterm deliveries and of low birthweight babies was largely, but not entirely, due to the high frequency of multiple births. The rate of stillbirth, perinatal mortality, and infant mortality were twice the national average, these excesses being due to the high frequency of multiple births. One or more major congenital malformations were detected during the first week of life in 35 (2.2%) of 1581 babies. This figure is comparable with population based estimates of the prevalence of congenital malformations. The types of malformations reported varied, and the number of each specific type was small. The health of the children was not evaluated beyond the perinatal period.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiple pregnancies often result from assisted conception and are the main determinant of the outcome of the pregnancies and of the health of the children at the time of birth. Congenital malformations are comparatively rare, so larger numbers of children need to be studied before firm conclusions can be drawn. The pooling of data from different countries is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Medical Research Council (Great Britain)

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2354290      PMCID: PMC1662883          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6734.1229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  4 in total

1.  Ovulation induction and neural tube defects.

Authors:  M C Cornel; L P ten Kate; M N Dukes; L T de Jong-v D Berg; R H Meyboom; H Garbis; P W Peters
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Congenital malformations after in-vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  P A Lancaster
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-12-12       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The quality of notification of congenital malformations.

Authors:  E G Knox; E H Armstrong; R Lancashire
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  An analysis of the obstetric outcome of 125 consecutive pregnancies conceived in vitro and resulting in 100 deliveries.

Authors:  M C Andrews; S J Muasher; D L Levy; H W Jones; J E Garcia; Z Rosenwaks; G S Jones; A A Acosta
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.661

  4 in total
  18 in total

1.  How to halve the prematurity rates of in vitro fertilization pregnancies in 4 days.

Authors:  F Olivennes; R Frydman; P Rufat; J de Mouzon; M Dehan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  IVF babies with ROP at higher gestational age and birth weight: implications of changing screening criteria.

Authors:  M Minasian; A Fielder
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  A meta-analysis of the impact of IVF and ICSI on major malformations after adjusting for the effect of subfertility.

Authors:  Alfred A Rimm; Alyce C Katayama; K Paul Katayama
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study.

Authors:  M Dhont; F De Neubourg; J Van der Elst; P De Sutter
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Patterns of progression and nonprogression through in vitro fertilization treatment.

Authors:  J A Emery; P Slade; B A Lieberman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Cryopreservation of embryos: medical, ethical, and legal issues.

Authors:  S J Fasouliotis; J G Schenker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  The impact of assisted reproduction on perinatal health care.

Authors:  M J Keirse; F M Helmerhorst
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1995

8.  Cost effectiveness of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  S Mor-Yosef
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  A benefit-risk assessment of medical treatment for uterine leiomyomas.

Authors:  Vincenzo De Leo; Giuseppe Morgante; Antonio La Marca; Maria Concetta Musacchio; Massimo Sorace; Chiara Cavicchioli; Felice Petraglia
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Attitudes of IVF parents regarding the IVF experience and their children.

Authors:  D A Greenfeld; S I Ort; D G Greenfeld; E E Jones; D L Olive
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.