Literature DB >> 6511875

Comparison of lysis-centrifugation with lysis-filtration and a conventional unvented bottle for blood cultures.

V J Gill, C H Zierdt, T C Wu, F Stock, P A Pizzo, J D MacLowry.   

Abstract

Evaluation of a commercially available lysis-centrifugation blood culture system (Isolator, DuPont Co., Wilmington, Del.) and a lysis-filtration blood culture system for 3,111 cultures showed that both methods had comparable recoveries (73 and 68%, respectively) of significant aerobic and facultatively anaerobic isolates. The unvented conventional blood culture bottle had a recovery rate of 59%. Although the lysis-centrifugation and lysis-filtration systems had comparable recoveries of pathogens, the lysis-centrifugation system had the advantage of having colonies immediately available for further testing. The contamination rate with the lysis-centrifugation system was 3%, compared with 6% with the lysis-filtration system and 0.4% with brain heart infusion.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6511875      PMCID: PMC271476          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.20.5.927-932.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Contamination of cultures processed with the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube.

Authors:  R B Thomson; S J Vanzo; N K Henry; K L Guenther; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of a lysis-centrifugation and biphasic bottle blood culture system during routine use.

Authors:  M T Kelly; G E Buck; M F Fojtasek
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Blood-lysing solution nontoxic to pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  C H Zierdt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical correlations of serial quantitative blood cultures determined by lysis-centrifugation in patients with persistent septicemia.

Authors:  E Whimbey; B Wong; T E Kiehn; D Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Development of a lysis-filtration blood culture technique.

Authors:  C H Zierdt; R L Kagan; J D MacLowry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Rapid automated disgnosis of bacteremia by impedance detection.

Authors:  R L Kagan; W H Schuette; C H Zierdt; J D MacLowry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evidence for transient Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia in patients and in healthy humans.

Authors:  C H Zierdt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  New centrifugation blood culture device.

Authors:  G L Dorn; K Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Lysis-filtration blood culture versus conventional blood culture in a bacteremic rabbit model.

Authors:  C H Zierdt; D L Peterson; J C Swan; J D MacLowry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube.

Authors:  N K Henry; C A McLimans; A J Wright; R L Thompson; W R Wilson; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Contamination of blood cultures during venepuncture: fact or myth?

Authors:  E Shahar; B S Wohl-Gottesman; L Shenkman
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Distribution of bacteria and yeasts within the 10-ml Isolator during the processing of seeded blood samples.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of lysis filtration as an adjunct to conventional blood culture.

Authors:  R Chan; R Munro; P Tomlinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  New system for blood culture.

Authors:  S R Marper; E Robbins; M S Ahmed; P Noone
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Large-scale clinical comparison of the lysis-centrifugation and radiometric systems for blood culture.

Authors:  P Brannon; T E Kiehn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Laboratory diagnosis of invasive candidiasis.

Authors:  J M Jones
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Detection and quantitation by lysis-filtration of bacteremia after different oral surgical procedures.

Authors:  A Heimdahl; G Hall; M Hedberg; H Sandberg; P O Söder; K Tunér; C E Nord
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of anaerobic bacteria in blood cultures by lysis filtration.

Authors:  A Heimdahl; K Josefsson; L von Konow; C E Nord
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Controlled comparison of the BACTEC high-blood-volume fungal medium, BACTEC Plus 26 aerobic blood culture bottle, and 10-milliliter isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia and bacteremia.

Authors:  M L Wilson; T E Davis; S Mirrett; J Reynolds; D Fuller; S D Allen; K K Flint; F Koontz; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Inoculum size and lot-to-lot variation as significant variables in the tube coagulase test for Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S T Selepak; F G Witebsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.