Literature DB >> 6508758

Quantitative role of parenchymal and non-parenchymal liver cells in the uptake of [14C]sucrose-labelled low-density lipoprotein in vivo.

L Harkes, J C Van Berkel.   

Abstract

In order to assess the relative importance of the receptor for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (apo-B,E receptor) in the various liver cell types for the catabolism of lipoproteins in vivo, human LDL was labelled with [14C]sucrose. Up to 4.5h after intravenous injection, [14C]sucrose becomes associated with liver almost linearly with time. During this time the liver is responsible for 70-80% of the removal of LDL from blood. A comparison of the uptake of [14C]sucrose-labelled LDL and reductive-methylated [14C]sucrose-labelled LDL ([14C]sucrose-labelled Me-LDL) by the liver shows that methylation leads to a 65% decrease of the LDL uptake. This indicated that 65% of the LDL uptake by liver is mediated by a specific apo-B,E receptor. Parenchymal and non-parenchymal liver cells were isolated at various times after intravenous injection of [14C]sucrose-labelled LDL and [14C]sucrose-labelled Me-LDL. Non-parenchymal liver cells accumulate at least 60 times as much [14C]sucrose-labelled LDL than do parenchymal cells accumulate at least 60 times as much [14C]sucrose-labelled LDL than do parenchymal cells when expressed per mg of cell protein. This factor is independent of the time after injection of LDL. Taking into account the relative protein contribution of the various liver cell types to the total liver, it can be calculated that non-parenchymal cells are responsible for 71% of the total liver uptake of [14C]sucrose-labelled LDL. A comparison of the cellular uptake of [14C]sucrose-labelled LDL and [14C]sucrose-labelled Me-LDL after 4.5h circulation indicates that 79% of the uptake of LDL by non-parenchymal cells is receptor-dependent. With parenchymal cells no significant difference in uptake between [14C]sucrose-labelled LDL and [14C]sucrose-labelled Me-LDL was found. A further separation of the nonparenchymal cells into Kupffer and endothelial cells by centrifugal elutriation shows that within the non-parenchymal-cell preparation solely the Kupffer cells are responsible for the receptor-dependent uptake of LDL. It is concluded that in rats the Kupffer cell is the main cell type responsible for the receptor-dependent catabolism of lipoproteins containing only apolipoprotein B.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6508758      PMCID: PMC1144393          DOI: 10.1042/bj2240021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem J        ISSN: 0264-6021            Impact factor:   3.857


  22 in total

1.  The effect of leupeptin on intracellular digestion of asialofetuin in rat hepatocytes.

Authors:  H Tolleshaug; T Berg
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  In vivo and in vitro uptake and degradation of acetylated low density lipoprotein by rat liver endothelial, Kupffer, and parenchymal cells.

Authors:  J F Nagelkerke; K P Barto; T J van Berkel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1983-10-25       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Isolated parenchymal, Kupffer and endothelial rat liver cells characterized by their lysosomal enzyme content.

Authors:  D L Knook; E C Sleyster
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1980-09-16       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  In vivo characteristics of a specific recognition site for LDL on non-parenchymal rat liver cells which differs from the 17 alpha-ethinyl estradiol-induced LDL receptor on parenchymal liver cells.

Authors:  L Harkes; T J Van Berkel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1984-07-06

5.  Cellular localization of the receptor-dependent and receptor-independent uptake of human LDL in the liver of normal and 17 alpha-ethinyl estradiol-treated rats.

Authors:  L Harkes; T J van Berkel
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1983-04-05       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Tissue sites of degradation of native and reductively methylated [14C]sucrose-labeled low density lipoprotein in rats. Contribution of receptor-dependent and receptor-independent pathways.

Authors:  T E Carew; R C Pittman; D Steinberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A saturable, high-affinity binding site for human low density lipoprotein on freshly isolated rat hepatocytes.

Authors:  L Harkes; T J van Berkel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1982-09-14

8.  Tissue sites of catabolism of rat and human low density lipoproteins in rats.

Authors:  R C Pittman; A D Attie; T E Carew; D Steinberg
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1982-01-15

9.  Measurement of receptor-independent lipoprotein catabolism using 1,2 cyclohexanedione-modified low density lipoprotein.

Authors:  H R Slater; C J Packard; J Shepherd
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.922

10.  The reticuloendothelial system and low density lipoprotein metabolism in the rabbit.

Authors:  C J Packard; H R Slater; J Shepherd
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1982-08-18
View more
  14 in total

1.  Recognition of chylomicron remnants and beta-migrating very-low-density lipoproteins by the remnant receptor of parenchymal liver cells is distinct from the liver alpha 2-macroglobulin-recognition site.

Authors:  M C van Dijk; G J Ziere; W Boers; C Linthorst; M K Bijsterbosch; T J van Berkel
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Uptake and degradation of human low-density lipoprotein by human liver parenchymal and Kupffer cells in culture.

Authors:  J A Kamps; J K Kruijt; J Kuiper; T J Van Berkel
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Beta-migrating very-low-density lipoproteins and chylomicron remnants bind to rat liver hepatocytes at a low-density-lipoprotein-receptor-independent site (the remnant receptor).

Authors:  J C Van Berkel; A Voorschuur; J Kuiper
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Receptor-independent low density lipoprotein transport in the rat in vivo. Quantitation, characterization, and metabolic consequences.

Authors:  D K Spady; S D Turley; J M Dietschy
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  The interaction in vivo of transferrin and asialotransferrin with liver cells.

Authors:  T J van Berkel; C J Dekker; J K Kruijt; H G van Eijk
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1987-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Short- and long-term effects of biliary drainage on hepatic cholesterol metabolism in the rat.

Authors:  M J Smit; A M Temmerman; R Havinga; F Kuipers; R J Vonk
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Receptor-mediated uptake of homologous low-density lipoproteins by isolated liver parenchymal cells of fetal rats.

Authors:  U Dürer; M Sommer; H Franke; B Schlag; R Dargel
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  Uptake of lactosylated low-density lipoprotein by galactose-specific receptors in rat liver.

Authors:  M K Bijsterbosch; T J Van Berkel
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1990-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Uptake of LDL in parenchymal and non-parenchymal rabbit liver cells in vivo. LDL uptake is increased in endothelial cells in cholesterol-fed rabbits.

Authors:  M S Nenseter; R Blomhoff; C A Drevon; G M Kindberg; K R Norum; T Berg
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1988-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Processing of cholesteryl ester from low-density lipoproteins in the rat. Hepatic metabolism and biliary secretion after uptake by different hepatic cell types.

Authors:  F Kuipers; J F Nagelkerke; H Bakkeren; R Havinga; T J Van Berkel; R J Vonk
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1989-02-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.