Literature DB >> 6282867

Tissue sites of degradation of native and reductively methylated [14C]sucrose-labeled low density lipoprotein in rats. Contribution of receptor-dependent and receptor-independent pathways.

T E Carew, R C Pittman, D Steinberg.   

Abstract

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) is catabolized by both receptor-dependent and receptor-independent pathways; methylated LDL (MeLDL) is catabolized only by receptor-independent mechanisms. Rats were injected with either LDL or MeLDL labeled with [14C]sucrose and the tissue sites of degradation were determined 24 h later. On degradation, the 14C-labeled ligand remains trapped intracellularly as a cumulative measure of degradation. The fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of [14C]sucrose-MeLDL was lower than that of [14C]sucrose-LDL (0.056 +/- 0.015 versus 0.118 +/- 0.025 h-1, p less than 0.01). Liver was the predominant site of catabolism of both LDL and MeLDL; more than 85% of catabolism was attributable to parenchymal cells in both cases. The fraction of the plasma LDL pool "cleared" per tissue weight per unit of time was determined for individual tissues. The differences in these rates for LDL and MeLDL are an approximation of receptor-mediated uptake of LDL. According to this method, 67.4% of hepatic uptake was attributable to receptors, as was 69.5% of adrenal, 65.4% of ovarian, 52.4% of intestinal, and 44.2% of renal uptake. In other studies, rats were continuously infused with LDL to down-regulate and saturate receptor prior to injection of labeled LDL or MeLDL. Rats infused with LDL exhibited a lower FCR for [14C]sucrose-LDL compared to controls (0.077 versus 0.120 h-1); the FCR for sucrose-MeLDL was unchanged by LDL infusion. The fractional degradation rate of [14C]sucrose-LDL by individual tissues was lowered by LDL infusion in liver, adrenal, ovary, and intestine (41.4, 57.3, 23.1, and 32.4% lower than controls, respectively). The determination of receptor dependency by this independent approach supports the conclusions reached using [14C]sucrose-LDL and [14C]sucrose-MeLDL in normolipemic animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6282867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  27 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear medicine and atherosclerosis.

Authors:  H Sinzinger; I Virgolini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

2.  Modeling of corticosteroid effects on hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptors and plasma lipid dynamics in rats.

Authors:  Anasuya Hazra; Nancy A Pyszczynski; Debra C DuBois; Richard R Almon; William J Jusko
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Probing of the expression of the low-density lipoprotein receptor in vivo using an anti-receptor monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  E Gherardi; D E Bowyer; C Fitzsimmons; T Le Cras; A Hutchings; G Butcher
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Low density lipoprotein labelling characterizes experimentally induced atherosclerotic lesions in rabbits in vivo as to presence of foam cells and endothelial coverage.

Authors:  I Virgolini; P Angelberger; J O'Grady; H Sinzinger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1991

5.  High density lipoprotein metabolism in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice.

Authors:  Franz Rinninger; Markus Heine; Roshni Singaraja; Michael Hayden; May Brundert; Rajasekhar Ramakrishnan; Joerg Heeren
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 5.922

6.  Receptor-independent low density lipoprotein transport in the rat in vivo. Quantitation, characterization, and metabolic consequences.

Authors:  D K Spady; S D Turley; J M Dietschy
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  A low density lipoprotein-methotrexate covalent complex and its activity against L1210 cells in vitro.

Authors:  G W Halbert; J F Stuart; A T Florence
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Metabolism of low density lipoproteins in rainbow trout.

Authors:  T Gjøen; T Berg
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.794

9.  Technetium-99m labelled LDL as a tracer for quantitative LDL scintigraphy. I. Tracer purification, in vitro and in vivo long-term stability, in vitro validation and biodistribution.

Authors:  T Leitha; M Hermann; M Hüttinger; P Angelberger; R Dudczak
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-08

10.  Evidence for sterol-independent regulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor activity in Hep-G2 cells.

Authors:  J L Ellsworth; C Chandrasekaran; A D Cooper
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.