Literature DB >> 36070032

Standardized procedure prevents perioperative and early complications in totally implantable venous-access ports-a complication analysis of more than 1000 TIVAP implantations.

Karolin Thiel1, Sarah Kalmbach2, Gerhard Maier2, Dörte Wichmann2, Martin Schenk2, Alfred Königsrainer2, Christian Thiel2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Since their invention 40 years ago, totally implantable venous-access ports (TIVAPs) have become indispensable in cancer treatment. The aim of our study was to analyze complications under standardized operative and perioperative procedures and to identify risk factors for premature port catheter explantation.
METHODS: A total of 1008 consecutive TIVAP implantations were studied for success rate, perioperative, early, and late complications. Surgical, clinical, and demographic factors were analyzed as potential risk factors for emergency port catheter explantation.
RESULTS: Successful surgical TIVAP implantation was achieved in 1005/1008 (99.7%) cases. No intraoperative or perioperative complications occurred. A total of 32 early complications and 88 late complications were observed leading to explantation in 11/32 (34.4%) and 34/88 (38.6%) cases, respectively. The most common complications were infections in 4.7% followed by thrombosis in 3.6%. Parameters that correlated with unplanned TIVAP explantation were gender (port in situ: female 95% vs. male 91%, p = 0.01), underlying disease (breast cancer 97% vs. gastrointestinal 89%, p = 0.004), indication (chemotherapy 95% vs. combination of chemotherapy and parenteral nutrition 64%, p < 0.0001), and type of complication (infection 13.4% vs. TIVAP-related complication 54% and thrombosis 95%, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Standardized operative and perioperative TIVAP implantation procedures provide excellent results and low explantation rate.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication analysis; Port catheter explantation; Port catheter implantation; Totally implantable venous-access ports

Year:  2022        PMID: 36070032     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02656-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   2.895


  5 in total

1.  The anatomy of the cephalic vein.

Authors:  F C Au
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 2.  The complications of central venous access systems: a study of 218 patients.

Authors:  J R Torramadé; J A Cienfuegos; J L Hernández; F Pardo; C Benito; J González; E Balén; V de Villa
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1993 Jun-Jul

3.  Insertion of Hickman catheters. A comparison of cutdown and percutaneous techniques.

Authors:  S J Davis; J S Thompson; J A Edney
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment.

Authors:  J E Niederhuber; W Ensminger; J W Gyves; M Liepman; K Doan; E Cozzi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 5.  Anticoagulation for people with cancer and central venous catheters.

Authors:  Lara A Kahale; Ibrahim G Tsolakian; Maram B Hakoum; Charbel F Matar; Maddalena Barba; Victor Ed Yosuico; Irene Terrenato; Francesca Sperati; Holger Schünemann; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.