Literature DB >> 6507742

Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer.

K E Deveney, L W Way.   

Abstract

In our follow-up study of 65 patients after curative surgery for colorectal cancer, tests other than history and physical examination detected only two cases of potentially curable recurrent colorectal cancer. As a routine follow-up test, carcinoembryonic antigen determination is preferable to computerized tomographic scanning, since the sensitivity and specificity of carcinoembryonic antigen and computerized tomographic scanning were found to be equivalent and carcinoembryonic antigen is much less expensive. There was no benefit to the routine use of liver function tests or chest roentgenograms during follow-up. Since barium enema contributed little to what colonoscopy accomplished with greater comfort to the patient, barium enemas should be used only when colonoscopy is not totally successful in reaching the cecum. The most beneficial aspect of the follow-up of these patients is probably the elimination of future metachronous lesions by removal of small, benign polyps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6507742     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90423-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  12 in total

1.  [Individual risk-related after-care in colorectal cancer?].

Authors:  B Böhm; J Osswald; H P Hucke; W Stock
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1991

2.  Symposium: The management of recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F F Attiyeh; H Ellis; M Killingback; G D Oates; P F Schofield; H J Staab; G Steele; P H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The role of CEA, TPA and CA 19-9 in the early detection of recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P Barillari; G Ramacciato; R de Angelis; P Gozzo; P Aurello; M Indinnimeo; S Valabrega; F D'Angelo; G Fegiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Follow-up recommendations for colon cancer.

Authors:  W Donald Buie; Jo-Anne P Attard
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

5.  Cost and effectiveness of follow-up examinations in patients with colorectal cancer resected for cure in a French population-based study.

Authors:  Frédéric Borie; Jean-Pierre Daurès; Bertrand Millat; Brigitte Trétarre
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  D J Bruinvels; A M Stiggelbout; J Kievit; H C van Houwelingen; J D Habbema; C J van de Velde
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Results of long-term follow-up after curative resection of Dukes A colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Matthias W Wichmann; Christian Müller; Hans M Hornung; Ulla Lau-Werner; Friedrich-Wilhelm Schildberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Follow-up in colorectal cancer patients: a cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  R A Audisio; P Setti-Carraro; M Segala; D Capko; B Andreoni; G Tiberio
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Postsurgical surveillance of colon cancer: preliminary cost analysis of physician examination, carcinoembryonic antigen testing, chest x-ray, and colonoscopy.

Authors:  R A Graham; S Wang; P J Catalano; D G Haller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; Bethany Shinkins; Indika Pathiraja; Nia W Roberts; Tim J James; Susan Mallett; Rafael Perera; John N Primrose; David Mant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.