Literature DB >> 1723133

[Individual risk-related after-care in colorectal cancer?].

B Böhm1, J Osswald, H P Hucke, W Stock.   

Abstract

Efficacy of the regular follow-up program and influence on survival rate following treatment of recurrence were evaluated. 556 follow-up records of patients after resection of colorectal cancer were analysed. The primary drop-out rate was 12.4%. Recurrences were found in 26.6% (n = 128). 53.1% of recurrences were symptomatic at diagnosis of recurrence. Curative resection of recurrence was only performed in 19.5%. 46.1% were given palliative and 34.4 no specific oncologic treatment. We define efficacy as the rate of curative asymptomatic recurrence. This was 3.5% of all patients. From the curative resection of recurrence only 6 patients were free of recurrence longer than 2 years. No second resection of recurrence was possible. Different treatment of recurrence did influence the survival rate (p = 0.09). There was no difference in prognosis for asymptomatic and symptomatic recurrences (p greater than 0.8). In order to increase the efficacy of follow-up for colorectal cancer we are introducing a new concept based on individual risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1723133     DOI: 10.1007/bf00186422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir        ISSN: 0023-8236


  29 in total

Review 1.  [Locoregional recurrence following rectum resection and rectum excision].

Authors:  R Häring; T Karavias
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The value of a follow-up programme after radical surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J T Ovaska; H J Järvinen; J P Mecklin
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  The follow-up of patients after definitive resections for large bowel cancer.

Authors:  W E Enker; R G Kramer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  The follow-up of patients following surgery for colorectal cancer--a personal view.

Authors:  W H Isbister
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.473

5.  [Prospective follow-up study of radically resected colorectal carcinoma. Status after 5 years].

Authors:  U Metzger; K Bronz; H Bühler; A Dolder; U Seefeld; A Hollinger; F Largiadèr
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1985-07-20

6.  Value of outpatient follow-up after curative surgery for carcinoma of the large bowel.

Authors:  J P Cochrane; J T Williams; R G Faber; W W Slack
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-03-01

7.  Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K E Deveney; L W Way
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  A simplified plan for follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer supported by prospective studies of laboratory and radiologic test results.

Authors:  P H Sugarbaker; F J Gianola; A Dwyer; N R Neuman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  [Effectiveness of after-care in colonic cancer].

Authors:  B Mentges; M Stahlschmidt; R Brückner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1987

10.  [Key role of the CEA test in the diagnosis and surgical therapy of recurrent colorectal cancer].

Authors:  A Quentmeier; P Schlag; C Herfarth
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 0.955

View more
  1 in total

1.  Results of long-term follow-up after curative resection of Dukes A colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Matthias W Wichmann; Christian Müller; Hans M Hornung; Ulla Lau-Werner; Friedrich-Wilhelm Schildberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.